These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6568279)
21. The effect of masking manuscripts for the peer-review process of an ophthalmic journal. Isenberg SJ; Sanchez E; Zafran KC Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jul; 93(7):881-4. PubMed ID: 19211602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Peer review in the Croatian Medical Journal from 1992 to 1996. Marusić A; Mestrović T; Petrovecki M; Marusić M Croat Med J; 1998 Mar; 39(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 9475799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Choosing the most effective keywords for your manuscript. Kremenak N J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):372. PubMed ID: 19635067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The art and science of reviewing manuscripts for orthopaedic journals: Part II. Optimizing the manuscript: practical hints for improving the quality of reviews. Levine AM; Heckman JD; Hensinger RN Instr Course Lect; 2004; 53():689-97. PubMed ID: 15116659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [The Editorial Advisory Committee]. Reyes H Rev Med Chil; 1996 Dec; 124(12):1421-2. PubMed ID: 9334474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ensuring the quality of peer-review process. Afifi M Saudi Med J; 2006 Aug; 27(8):1253. PubMed ID: 16883466 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Review criteria for research manuscripts. Bordage G; Caelleigh AS; Steinecke A; Bland CJ; Crandall SJ; McGaghie WC; Pangaro LN; Penn G; Regehr G; Shea JS; Acad Med; 2001 Sep; 76(9):897-978. PubMed ID: 11565558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [The art of writing a manuscript. 2. The author's answer]. Bergstrand CG Nord Med; 1988; 103(2):66-8. PubMed ID: 3380675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Electronic manuscripts: the periodicals earn money, the referees pay]. Kelly KB Lakartidningen; 2005 Mar 14-20; 102(11):888. PubMed ID: 15835532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Peer review and the evaluation of manuscripts. Crawford S Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1988 Jan; 76(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 3370379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. International Journal of Legal Medicine's manuscript submission and peer-review system goes electronic! Brinkmann B; Pfeiffer H Int J Legal Med; 2009 May; 123(3):187. PubMed ID: 19347347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Digital plagiarism--the Web giveth and the Web shall taketh. Barrie JM; Presti DE J Med Internet Res; 2000; 2(1):E6. PubMed ID: 11720925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Tidsskriftet, peer review and medical publishing]. Bjørheim J; Frich JC; Gjersvik P; Jacobsen G; Swensen E Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 16397649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. How to cope with manuscript rejection. Peregrin T J Am Diet Assoc; 2007 Feb; 107(2):190, 192-3. PubMed ID: 17258951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The top 10 reasons why manuscripts are not accepted for publication. Pierson DJ Respir Care; 2004 Oct; 49(10):1246-52. PubMed ID: 15447812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Revision of manuscripts for scholarly publication. Dowd SB; McElveny C Radiol Technol; 1997; 69(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 9323765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [From paper to Internet-based manuscript submission]. Schroeder TV; Kitaj T Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Jan; 167(1):25. PubMed ID: 15675159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. How a submitted manuscript is processed. Peh WC; Ng KH Singapore Med J; 2009 Sep; 50(9):853-5; quiz 856. PubMed ID: 19787169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]