These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6568727)

  • 1. Patients' word v. nurse's word: documentation. Case in point: Sheppard v. Kimbrough (318 S.E. 2d - SC).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1984 Nov; 25(6):4. PubMed ID: 6568727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Plastic cup on i.v. site: nurse-expert testimony. Case in point: Morris v. Children's Hospital Medical Center (596 N.E. 2d 1110-OH [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Dec; 33(7):4. PubMed ID: 1494665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. X-ray machine falls on patient: nurses' liability issue. Case in point: Carter v. Anderson Memorial Hosp. (325 S.E. 2d 78--SC).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1985 Apr; 25(11):2. PubMed ID: 3846311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Injection technique: R.N. expert opinion. Case in point: Tripp v. Humana, Inc. (474 So. 2d 88 - AL).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1985 Oct; 26(5):2. PubMed ID: 3852349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nurse's expert opinion on 'causation' o.k. for pre suit purpose. Case on point: Apostolico v Orlando Regional Health Care System, 871 So.2d 283--FL (2004).
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Sep; 45(4):2. PubMed ID: 15537117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Witness for the prosecution.
    Condliffe B
    Nurs Times; 2001 Jul 19-25; 97(29):26-7. PubMed ID: 11957499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "Poor nursing practice": expert opinions. Case in point: Breit v. St. Luke's Memorial Hosp. (743 P. 2d 1254--WA).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1987 Dec; 28(7):4. PubMed ID: 3423266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pt. slips & breaks hip on "leakage": expert testimony. Case in point: McMillan v. King (577 So. 2d 519-MS (1990)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 May; 30(12):2. PubMed ID: 2356315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Were nurses responsible for injury from infiltrating i.v.? Case on point: Graves v. Breakwood Health Services, Inc., (12/18/2009)-AL So.3d.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Feb; 50(9):4. PubMed ID: 20232665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Who has responsibility to monitor O.R. blood loss? Case in point: Uhr v. Lutheran General Hospital (589 N.E.2d 723--IL [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):2. PubMed ID: 1410393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The nurse's role as an expert witness.
    Fiesta J
    Nurs Manage; 1991 Mar; 22(3):28-9. PubMed ID: 2002942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ICU nursing: incomplete medical orders. Case in point: Warren v. Canal et als (300 S.E. 2d 557 - NC).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1983 Jun; 24(1):4. PubMed ID: 6554838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MI: court OKs nurse's affidavit re nursing: medical expert's affidavit required for causation.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2007 May; 47(12):3. PubMed ID: 17605183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nurse "log rolls" solo: adverse effects. Case in point: Routh v. St. John's Mercy Med. Center (785 S.W. 2d 744--MO (1990)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Jul; 31(2):4. PubMed ID: 2377732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A malpractice lawsuit simulation: critical care providers learn as participants in a mock trial.
    Jenkins RC; Lemak CH
    Crit Care Nurse; 2009 Aug; 29(4):52-60. PubMed ID: 19648598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nurses were illegally barred from review panel. Case on point: Harlet v. St. Vincent Hospitals and Health Svcs, 2001 WL 503459 N.E.2d-IN.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2001 Jun; 42(1):4. PubMed ID: 11995401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemoclips left in patient: nurse's notes ignored. Case in point: St. Francis Reg. Med. Ctr. V. Hale (752 P. 2d 129--KS (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Jun; 29(1):4. PubMed ID: 3260679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The nurse as an expert witness.
    Creighton H
    Nurs Manage; 1988 Aug; 19(8):22-3. PubMed ID: 3399203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nurse's failure to phone M.D.: hospital liability. Case in point: Nutty v. Jewish Hospital (571 F. Supp. 1050-IL).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1984 Jan; 24(8):2. PubMed ID: 6560672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Forewarned is forearmed.
    Coombes R
    Nurs Times; 1999 Sep 8-14; 95(36):12-3. PubMed ID: 10661238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.