These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6568727)

  • 21. Nurse-expert's testimony held admissible. Case in point: Wickliffe v. Sunrise Hosp., Inc. (766 P. 2d 1322--NV (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Mar; 29(10):2. PubMed ID: 2704834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Was there sufficient nurse expert testimony to go to a jury? Case on point: Nichols v. Good Samaritan Hospital, 2004 WL 2222384 -CA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Oct; 45(5):2. PubMed ID: 15559717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nurse and the law. Expert evidence.
    Langslow A
    Aust Nurses J; 1989 Nov; 19(5):30-1. PubMed ID: 2590089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Limiting liability to avoid malpractice litigation.
    Ladebauche P
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1995; 20(5):243-6, 248. PubMed ID: 7476005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A nurse's limits as an expert witness.
    Tammelleo AD
    RN; 1987 Nov; 50(11):73-4. PubMed ID: 3685802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Must nurse expert have recent hands-on experience? Case on point: Baptist Medical Center of Beaches, Inc. v. Rhodin, 1D10-859 (7/16/2010)-FL.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Sep; 51(4):4. PubMed ID: 20954519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nurse-expert fails to 'go to bat' in testifying for plaintiffs. Case on point: Ross v. Redding Medical Center, 2003 WL 21246105-CA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Jun; 44(1):4. PubMed ID: 12886709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Was apnea monitor on or off? Expert testimony. Case in point: Dent v. Memorial Hosp. of Adel, Inc. (408 S.E.2d 473--GA (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Jan; 32(8):2. PubMed ID: 1542727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Expert testimony: the I.V. nurse's responsibility.
    Weinstein SM
    NITA; 1984; 7(5):423-4. PubMed ID: 6567014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Why wasn't 'continuous treatment' doctrine applied? Case on point: Knox v. Greenville Hospital System, 2005 WL 20007 S.E.2d--SC.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2005 Jan; 45(8):2. PubMed ID: 15754900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. May you delay implementing Dr.'s orders? Case in point: Koeniguer v. Eckrich (422 N.W. 2d 600--SD (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Jul; 29(2):2. PubMed ID: 3406422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Juror formerly worked as RN at hospital: new trial. Case on point: Mikesinovich v. Reynolds Mem. Hosp., Inc., No. 32968(W.Va. 11/16/2006) S.E.2d -WV.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2007 Jan; 47(8):4. PubMed ID: 17310606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Nurse's testimony impacts on patient's 'capacity' to execute will. Case on point: Stephenson v. Stephenson, 2003 WL 1618090 S.W.3d--TN.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Apr; 43(11):4. PubMed ID: 12764981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. RN's expert testimony not 'required'--not 'barred'. Case on point: Davis v. Montgomery Cnty. Mem. Hosp., No. 6-086/05 (Iowa app. 07/12/2006)-IA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2006 Jul; 47(2):2. PubMed ID: 16937912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Failure to maintain adequate level of anesthesia: punitive damages. Case in point: Morales v. Webb (409 S.E. 2d 57200GA (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Feb; 32(9):2. PubMed ID: 1565797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The nurse--doctor's best friend or worst enemy? Case in point. Pendarvis v. Pennington (521 So. 2d 969--AL (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 May; 28(12):4. PubMed ID: 3387583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Physicians not qualified as experts on nursing care. Case on point: Sullivan v. Edward Hospital, 2004 WL 228956 N.E.2d--IL.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Mar; 44(10):4. PubMed ID: 15085702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. CA: Did RN fail to document or monitor i.v.?: Nonsuit for lack of Dr.'s testimony re causation. Galvez v. Loma Linda University Medical Center, E047803 CAAPP4-2 (5/6/2010)-CA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Aug; 51(3):3. PubMed ID: 21105314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. General form for requesting hospital documents.
    Milazzo VL
    Natl Med Leg J; 1992; 3(1):5. PubMed ID: 1728941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dr. testifies as to national standards of nursing care.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Apr; 34(11):1. PubMed ID: 8184091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.