BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6568727)

  • 21. Nurse-expert's testimony held admissible. Case in point: Wickliffe v. Sunrise Hosp., Inc. (766 P. 2d 1322--NV (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Mar; 29(10):2. PubMed ID: 2704834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Was there sufficient nurse expert testimony to go to a jury? Case on point: Nichols v. Good Samaritan Hospital, 2004 WL 2222384 -CA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Oct; 45(5):2. PubMed ID: 15559717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nurse and the law. Expert evidence.
    Langslow A
    Aust Nurses J; 1989 Nov; 19(5):30-1. PubMed ID: 2590089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Limiting liability to avoid malpractice litigation.
    Ladebauche P
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1995; 20(5):243-6, 248. PubMed ID: 7476005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A nurse's limits as an expert witness.
    Tammelleo AD
    RN; 1987 Nov; 50(11):73-4. PubMed ID: 3685802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Must nurse expert have recent hands-on experience? Case on point: Baptist Medical Center of Beaches, Inc. v. Rhodin, 1D10-859 (7/16/2010)-FL.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Sep; 51(4):4. PubMed ID: 20954519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nurse-expert fails to 'go to bat' in testifying for plaintiffs. Case on point: Ross v. Redding Medical Center, 2003 WL 21246105-CA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Jun; 44(1):4. PubMed ID: 12886709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Was apnea monitor on or off? Expert testimony. Case in point: Dent v. Memorial Hosp. of Adel, Inc. (408 S.E.2d 473--GA (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Jan; 32(8):2. PubMed ID: 1542727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Expert testimony: the I.V. nurse's responsibility.
    Weinstein SM
    NITA; 1984; 7(5):423-4. PubMed ID: 6567014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Why wasn't 'continuous treatment' doctrine applied? Case on point: Knox v. Greenville Hospital System, 2005 WL 20007 S.E.2d--SC.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2005 Jan; 45(8):2. PubMed ID: 15754900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. May you delay implementing Dr.'s orders? Case in point: Koeniguer v. Eckrich (422 N.W. 2d 600--SD (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Jul; 29(2):2. PubMed ID: 3406422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Juror formerly worked as RN at hospital: new trial. Case on point: Mikesinovich v. Reynolds Mem. Hosp., Inc., No. 32968(W.Va. 11/16/2006) S.E.2d -WV.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2007 Jan; 47(8):4. PubMed ID: 17310606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Nurse's testimony impacts on patient's 'capacity' to execute will. Case on point: Stephenson v. Stephenson, 2003 WL 1618090 S.W.3d--TN.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Apr; 43(11):4. PubMed ID: 12764981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. RN's expert testimony not 'required'--not 'barred'. Case on point: Davis v. Montgomery Cnty. Mem. Hosp., No. 6-086/05 (Iowa app. 07/12/2006)-IA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2006 Jul; 47(2):2. PubMed ID: 16937912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Failure to maintain adequate level of anesthesia: punitive damages. Case in point: Morales v. Webb (409 S.E. 2d 57200GA (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Feb; 32(9):2. PubMed ID: 1565797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The nurse--doctor's best friend or worst enemy? Case in point. Pendarvis v. Pennington (521 So. 2d 969--AL (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 May; 28(12):4. PubMed ID: 3387583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Physicians not qualified as experts on nursing care. Case on point: Sullivan v. Edward Hospital, 2004 WL 228956 N.E.2d--IL.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Mar; 44(10):4. PubMed ID: 15085702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. CA: Did RN fail to document or monitor i.v.?: Nonsuit for lack of Dr.'s testimony re causation. Galvez v. Loma Linda University Medical Center, E047803 CAAPP4-2 (5/6/2010)-CA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Aug; 51(3):3. PubMed ID: 21105314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. General form for requesting hospital documents.
    Milazzo VL
    Natl Med Leg J; 1992; 3(1):5. PubMed ID: 1728941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dr. testifies as to national standards of nursing care.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Apr; 34(11):1. PubMed ID: 8184091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.