277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 656880)
1. Abortion law reform.
Bury J
Br Med J; 1978 Jun; 1(6128):1698-9. PubMed ID: 656880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion denied.
Barron SL
IPPF Med Bull; 1986 Apr; 20(2):3-4. PubMed ID: 12340686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Twenty one years of legal abortion.
Munday D; Francome C; Savage W
BMJ; 1989 May; 298(6682):1231-4. PubMed ID: 2502225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gynaecologists and abortion in Northern Ireland.
Francome C
J Biosoc Sci; 1994 Jul; 26(3):389-94. PubMed ID: 7929486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Legal aspects involved in the development of anti-progesterones for fertility control.
Roberts I
Hum Reprod; 1988 Aug; 3(6):815-7. PubMed ID: 3220947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perinatal rights.
Munir AE
Med Sci Law; 1984 Jan; 24(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 6700400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Medicine and the law. The postcoital pill and intrauterine device: contraceptive or abortifacient?
Brahams D
Lancet; 1983 May; 1(8332):1039. PubMed ID: 6133073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Legal abortion].
Tarnesby HP
Minerva Ginecol; 1976 May; 28(5):458-73. PubMed ID: 1018828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. British abortion act.
IPPF Med Bull; 1967; 1(6):3. PubMed ID: 12275358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Czechoslovakia 1991: abortion and contraception.
Buresova A
Plan Parent Eur; 1991 Sep; 20(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 12284554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. By the London Post. The abortion law reviewed--free contraception--angry angels.
Lister J
N Engl J Med; 1974 Jul; 291(4):192-4. PubMed ID: 4599659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. England and Wales: meeting the needs of European women.
Cossey D
Plan Parent Eur; 1989; 18(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 12315816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prenatal diagnosis and late termination: a legal perspective.
Skene L
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Feb; 35(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 7771995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New limits.
Carlisle D
Nurs Times; 1990 May 9-15; 86(19):22-3. PubMed ID: 2342929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Editorial: A criminal approach to abortion.
Br Med J; 1975 May; 2(5967):352-3. PubMed ID: 1131598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The legislative process in changing therapeutic abortion laws. The Colorado experience.
Lamm RD; Downing S; Heller A
Am J Orthopsychiatry; 1969 Jul; 39(4):684-90. PubMed ID: 5816898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Doctors and the global population crisis.
Adam S; McPherson A
Br Med J; 1977 Nov; 2(6098):1356. PubMed ID: 589201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Regina v. Salford Health Authority, Ex Parte Janaway, 12 February 1987.
United Kingdom. High Court. Queen's Bench Division
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1987; 14():41. PubMed ID: 12346723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Northern Ireland: an anomaly.
Simpson A
Plan Parent Eur; 1989; 18(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 12315826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modern medical technologies in Commonwealth law and beyond.
Cook RJ
IPPF Med Bull; 1983 Aug; 17(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 12279588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
