These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6569342)

  • 1. College evidence calls for 'immediate and significant pay increases'.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Dec; (377):suppl 3. PubMed ID: 6569342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trevor Clay assures that College is geared to act if PM falls over pay, but warns...pressure now could do harm.
    Chudley P
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 May; (347):1. PubMed ID: 6563413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 'Don't squeeze the nurses': College plea on pay.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1985 Apr; (392):1. PubMed ID: 3845358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regional pay: the nursing organisations' viewpoint.
    Nurs Stand; 1989 Jan; 3(18):12-3. PubMed ID: 2494513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recruitment and retention: vital evidence in the pay debate.
    Lampada; 1988 Jan; (13):4. PubMed ID: 3357360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gearing up for the next pay review.
    Chudley P
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Aug; (358):1, 11. PubMed ID: 6565990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Members vote for peace and pay review promise.
    Chudley P
    RCN Nurs Stand; 1982 Dec; (276):1, 8. PubMed ID: 6984527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Royal College of Nursing. Double triumph.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1987 Apr; (494):4. PubMed ID: 3648490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. NATN evidence to the Nurses Pay Review Body.
    NATNEWS; 1987 May; 24(5):11. PubMed ID: 3648481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nurses's pay: a solid case.
    Sylvester J
    Nurs Stand; 1989 Oct; 4(5):22. PubMed ID: 2511481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pay: reviewing the situation.
    Hand D
    Nurs Stand; 1991 Nov 27-Dec 3; 6(10):18-9. PubMed ID: 1764394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pay campaign. Working to rules.
    Payne D
    Nurs Times; 1995 Apr 12-18; 91(15):18. PubMed ID: 7731836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. RCM evidence to--the Pay Review Body for nursing and midwifery staffs and the professions allied to medicine 1985.
    Midwives Chron; 1985 Feb; 98(1165):suppl 1-30. PubMed ID: 3844596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pay. In and out of pocket.
    Leifer D; Scott G
    Nurs Stand; 1995 May 31-Jun 6; 9(36):21. PubMed ID: 7612439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. All at sea on pay?
    Webb J
    Nurs Times; 1987 Jan 14-20; 83(2):18-9. PubMed ID: 3643548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Initial views on pay review body.
    Ellis S
    RCN Nurs Stand; 1983 Jan; (277):1. PubMed ID: 6550405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Royal College of Nursing: never the same; fees system.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Aug; (358):4. PubMed ID: 6565992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Back to the 80 pound pay target.
    Packham H
    Nurs Mirror; 1979 Jun; 148(23):14-6. PubMed ID: 256096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pay campaign. Striking precedents.
    Snell J
    Nurs Times; 1995 Mar 22-8; 91(12):20-1. PubMed ID: 7716032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pay campaign. Stringing along.
    Cassidy J
    Nurs Times; 1995 Apr 19-25; 91(16):16. PubMed ID: 7731850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.