These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 65695)

  • 41. Difficult delivery of new abortion laws.
    N Engl J Med; 1969 May; 280(22):1240-1. PubMed ID: 5767468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The Abortion Act 1967. (a). The advantages and disadvantages.
    Baird D
    R Soc Health J; 1970; 90(6):291-5. PubMed ID: 5492742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effects of legalized abortion in England.
    O'Sullivan JV
    Hosp Prog; 1971 Jun; 52(6):75-8. PubMed ID: 5089672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The Abortion Act 1967: the legal aspects.
    Samuels A
    Med Sci Law; 1969 Jan; 9(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 5385264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Can Congress settle the abortion issue?
    Segers MC
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Jun; 12(3):20-8. PubMed ID: 7107237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. On the sociology and social ethics of abortion.
    Bagley C
    Ethics Sci Med; 1976 May; 3(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 1278147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Abortion (Amendment) Bill.
    Roche KP; Jessiman I
    Br Med J; 1980 Apr; 280(6221):1088. PubMed ID: 7388412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Abortion Act 1967. (c). Implications for the family.
    Kemp J
    R Soc Health J; 1970; 90(6):299-301 passim. PubMed ID: 5492744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [More pregnancy interruptions in Great Britain].
    Munch Med Wochenschr; 1968 Apr; ():Suppl 36:6. PubMed ID: 5695975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Abortion legislation.
    Livingstone A
    Lancet; 1988 Feb; 1(8581):362. PubMed ID: 2893171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Abortion (Amendment) Bill.
    Dundon S
    Lancet; 1980 Feb; 1(8165):429. PubMed ID: 6101885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. It's time for a change?
    Morris P
    Nurs Mirror; 1979 May; 148(19):5. PubMed ID: 255294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Pregnancy interruptions. New English law].
    Händel K
    Med Klin; 1969 Jun; 64(24):1137-44. PubMed ID: 5809492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Benyon's progress.
    Lancet; 1977 Jul; 2(8029):120-1. PubMed ID: 69200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Recent changes in legislation. A police officer's observations.
    Mackenzie M
    Med Sci Law; 1969 Jan; 9(1):66-7. PubMed ID: 5385272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Abortion Act 1967.
    Addison PH
    Lancet; 1968 Aug; 2(7566):503-7. PubMed ID: 4174519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Report on working of British abortion law.
    IPPF Med Bull; 1974 Apr; 8(2):3-4. PubMed ID: 4468883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Debating a question of time.
    Shevas A
    Nurs Mirror; 1979 Nov; 149(19):6. PubMed ID: 259295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Therapeutic abortion.
    Stallworthy J
    Practitioner; 1970 Mar; 204(221):393-400. PubMed ID: 5434398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The new ethics of abortion.
    Greenwood J
    J Med Ethics; 2001 Oct; 27 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii2-4. PubMed ID: 11574650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.