These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

900 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6571220)

  • 1. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data.
    Nei M; Tajima F; Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1983; 19(2):153-70. PubMed ID: 6571220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. I. Distantly related species.
    Tateno Y; Nei M; Tajima F
    J Mol Evol; 1982; 18(6):387-404. PubMed ID: 7175956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of phylogenetic trees estimated from DNA sequence data.
    Sourdis J; Krimbas C
    Mol Biol Evol; 1987 Mar; 4(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 3447006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative efficiencies of the maximum parsimony and distance-matrix methods in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree.
    Sourdis J; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1988 May; 5(3):298-311. PubMed ID: 3386530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phylogenetic analysis and intraspecific variation: performance of parsimony, likelihood, and distance methods.
    Wiens JJ; Servedio MR
    Syst Biol; 1998 Jun; 47(2):228-53. PubMed ID: 12064228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA.
    Takezaki N; Nei M
    Genetics; 1996 Sep; 144(1):389-99. PubMed ID: 8878702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.
    Saitou N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1987 Jul; 4(4):406-25. PubMed ID: 3447015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
    Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simple method for constructing phylogenetic trees from distance matrices.
    Li WH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1981 Feb; 78(2):1085-9. PubMed ID: 6940127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic distances and ordination: the land snail Helix aspersa in north Africa as a test case.
    Guiller A; Bellido A; Madec L
    Syst Biol; 1998 Jun; 47(2):208-27. PubMed ID: 12064227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-parsimony and distance-matrix methods of phylogeny construction for restriction data.
    Lin J; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1991 May; 8(3):356-65. PubMed ID: 1677154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The gene tree delusion.
    Springer MS; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):1-33. PubMed ID: 26238460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny.
    Russo CA; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Mar; 13(3):525-36. PubMed ID: 8742641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Twisted trees and inconsistency of tree estimation when gaps are treated as missing data - The impact of model mis-specification in distance corrections.
    McTavish EJ; Steel M; Holder MT
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2015 Dec; 93():289-95. PubMed ID: 26256643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of evolutionary distance for reconstructing molecular phylogenetic trees.
    Tajima F; Takezaki N
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):278-86. PubMed ID: 8170368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The K tree score: quantification of differences in the relative branch length and topology of phylogenetic trees.
    Soria-Carrasco V; Talavera G; Igea J; Castresana J
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Nov; 23(21):2954-6. PubMed ID: 17890735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A stochastic Farris transform for genetic data under the multispecies coalescent with applications to data requirements.
    Dasarathy G; Mossel E; Nowak R; Roch S
    J Math Biol; 2022 Apr; 84(5):36. PubMed ID: 35394192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel measure of genetic distance for highly polymorphic tandem repeat loci.
    Shriver MD; Jin L; Boerwinkle E; Deka R; Ferrell RE; Chakraborty R
    Mol Biol Evol; 1995 Sep; 12(5):914-20. PubMed ID: 7476137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of genetic distance measures using human SNP genotype data.
    Libiger O; Nievergelt CM; Schork NJ
    Hum Biol; 2009 Aug; 81(4):389-406. PubMed ID: 20067366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating species trees using approximate Bayesian computation.
    Fan HH; Kubatko LS
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2011 May; 59(2):354-63. PubMed ID: 21397706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 45.