BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

689 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6571220)

  • 1. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data.
    Nei M; Tajima F; Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1983; 19(2):153-70. PubMed ID: 6571220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. I. Distantly related species.
    Tateno Y; Nei M; Tajima F
    J Mol Evol; 1982; 18(6):387-404. PubMed ID: 7175956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of phylogenetic trees estimated from DNA sequence data.
    Sourdis J; Krimbas C
    Mol Biol Evol; 1987 Mar; 4(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 3447006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative efficiencies of the maximum parsimony and distance-matrix methods in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree.
    Sourdis J; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1988 May; 5(3):298-311. PubMed ID: 3386530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phylogenetic analysis and intraspecific variation: performance of parsimony, likelihood, and distance methods.
    Wiens JJ; Servedio MR
    Syst Biol; 1998 Jun; 47(2):228-53. PubMed ID: 12064228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA.
    Takezaki N; Nei M
    Genetics; 1996 Sep; 144(1):389-99. PubMed ID: 8878702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.
    Saitou N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1987 Jul; 4(4):406-25. PubMed ID: 3447015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
    Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simple method for constructing phylogenetic trees from distance matrices.
    Li WH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1981 Feb; 78(2):1085-9. PubMed ID: 6940127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic distances and ordination: the land snail Helix aspersa in north Africa as a test case.
    Guiller A; Bellido A; Madec L
    Syst Biol; 1998 Jun; 47(2):208-27. PubMed ID: 12064227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-parsimony and distance-matrix methods of phylogeny construction for restriction data.
    Lin J; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1991 May; 8(3):356-65. PubMed ID: 1677154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny.
    Russo CA; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Mar; 13(3):525-36. PubMed ID: 8742641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of evolutionary distance for reconstructing molecular phylogenetic trees.
    Tajima F; Takezaki N
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):278-86. PubMed ID: 8170368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel measure of genetic distance for highly polymorphic tandem repeat loci.
    Shriver MD; Jin L; Boerwinkle E; Deka R; Ferrell RE; Chakraborty R
    Mol Biol Evol; 1995 Sep; 12(5):914-20. PubMed ID: 7476137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonuniformity of nucleotide substitution rates in molecular evolution: computer simulation and analysis of 5S ribosomal RNA sequences.
    Manske CL; Chapman DJ
    J Mol Evol; 1987; 26(3):226-51. PubMed ID: 3129569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical properties of molecular tree construction methods under the neutral mutation model.
    Tateno Y; Tajima F
    J Mol Evol; 1986; 23(4):354-61. PubMed ID: 3104607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference under the criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution, and maximum likelihood when a large number of sequences are used.
    Takahashi K; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2000 Aug; 17(8):1251-8. PubMed ID: 10908645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the quality of tree-based protein classification.
    Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of protein distance measures and tree-building methods for phylogenetic tree reconstruction.
    Hollich V; Milchert L; Arvestad L; Sonnhammer EL
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Nov; 22(11):2257-64. PubMed ID: 16049194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationships between gene trees and species trees.
    Pamilo P; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1988 Sep; 5(5):568-83. PubMed ID: 3193878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.