These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

900 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6571220)

  • 41. Sources of error inherent in species-tree estimation: impact of mutational and coalescent effects on accuracy and implications for choosing among different methods.
    Huang H; He Q; Kubatko LS; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2010 Oct; 59(5):573-83. PubMed ID: 20833951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Phylogenetic inference with weighted codon evolutionary distances.
    Criscuolo A; Michel CJ
    J Mol Evol; 2009 Apr; 68(4):377-92. PubMed ID: 19308635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Interior-branch and bootstrap tests of phylogenetic trees.
    Sitnikova T; Rzhetsky A; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1995 Mar; 12(2):319-33. PubMed ID: 7700156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Impact of deep coalescence and recombination on the estimation of phylogenetic relationships among species using AFLP markers.
    García-Pereira MJ; Carvajal-Rodríguez A; Whelan S; Caballero A; Quesada H
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Jul; 76():102-9. PubMed ID: 24631855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. MAST: Phylogenetic Inference with Mixtures Across Sites and Trees.
    Wong TKF; Cherryh C; Rodrigo AG; Hahn MW; Minh BQ; Lanfear R
    Syst Biol; 2024 Jul; 73(2):375-391. PubMed ID: 38421146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. To Include or Not to Include: The Impact of Gene Filtering on Species Tree Estimation Methods.
    Molloy EK; Warnow T
    Syst Biol; 2018 Mar; 67(2):285-303. PubMed ID: 29029338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evolutionary Rate Variation among Lineages in Gene Trees has a Negative Impact on Species-Tree Inference.
    Vankan M; Ho SYW; Duchêne DA
    Syst Biol; 2022 Feb; 71(2):490-500. PubMed ID: 34255084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates.
    Kuhner MK; Felsenstein J
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 May; 11(3):459-68. PubMed ID: 8015439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Probabilistic Species Tree Distances: Implementing the Multispecies Coalescent to Compare Species Trees Within the Same Model-Based Framework Used to Estimate Them.
    Adams RH; Castoe TA
    Syst Biol; 2020 Jan; 69(1):194-207. PubMed ID: 31086978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effects of sequence length, tree topology, and number of taxa on the performance of phylogenetic methods.
    Charleston MA; Hendy MD; Penny D
    J Comput Biol; 1994; 1(2):133-51. PubMed ID: 8790460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences based on the distribution of substitution rates among sites as estimated by parsimony.
    Tourasse NJ; Gouy M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1997 Mar; 14(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 9066796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Empirical tests of the reliability of phylogenetic trees constructed with microsatellite DNA.
    Takezaki N; Nei M
    Genetics; 2008 Jan; 178(1):385-92. PubMed ID: 18202381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions.
    Liu L; Pearl DK
    Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):504-14. PubMed ID: 17562474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Measures of clade confidence do not correlate with accuracy of phylogenetic trees.
    Hall BG; Salipante SJ
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2007 Mar; 3(3):e51. PubMed ID: 17367204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The devil in the details: interactions between the branch-length prior and likelihood model affect node support and branch lengths in the phylogeny of the Psoraceae.
    Ekman S; Blaalid R
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jul; 60(4):541-61. PubMed ID: 21436107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Statistical method for estimating the standard errors of branch lengths in a phylogenetic tree reconstructed without assuming equal rates of nucleotide substitution among different lineages.
    Tajima F
    Mol Biol Evol; 1992 Jan; 9(1):168-81. PubMed ID: 1552838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Properties of consensus methods for inferring species trees from gene trees.
    Degnan JH; DeGiorgio M; Bryant D; Rosenberg NA
    Syst Biol; 2009 Feb; 58(1):35-54. PubMed ID: 20525567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A computer simulation analysis of the accuracy of partial genome sequencing and restriction fragment analysis in the reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships.
    Qiao B; Goldberg TL; Olsen GJ; Weigel RM
    Infect Genet Evol; 2006 Jul; 6(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 16406823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. New weighting methods for phylogenetic tree reconstruction using multiple loci.
    Misawa K; Tajima F
    J Mol Evol; 2012 Aug; 75(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 22871951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The relationship between the number of loci and the statistical support for the topology of UPGMA trees obtained from genetic distance data.
    Highton R
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1993 Dec; 2(4):337-43. PubMed ID: 8049782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 45.