These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6571958)

  • 1. Medical Practitioners Disciplinary Committee review of complaints.
    Richwhite DL
    N Z Med J; 1983 Jan; 96(724):58-60. PubMed ID: 6571958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical Practitioners Disciplinary Committee: analysis of complaints for 1982.
    Richwhite DL
    N Z Med J; 1983 Nov; 96(743 Pt 2):931-4. PubMed ID: 6579414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Who disciplines the disciplinary committee?
    Chan MJ
    N Z Med J; 1988 Oct; 101(856 Pt 1):669. PubMed ID: 3186009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical discipline. Medical practitioners Disciplinary Committee. Analysis of complaints investigated in 1979.
    Richwhite DL
    N Z Med J; 1980 Sep; 92(668):248-50. PubMed ID: 6935547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Review committee on medical education.
    Haddon OB
    N Z Med J; 1990 Jan; 103(882):22. PubMed ID: 2304677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medical Practitioners Disciplinary Committee analysis of complaints in 1978.
    N Z Med J; 1979 Oct; 90(645):305-7. PubMed ID: 292887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New Zealand doctors' attitudes towards the complaints and disciplinary process.
    Cunningham W
    N Z Med J; 2004 Jul; 117(1198):U973. PubMed ID: 15326496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A lack of understanding of the rulings by disciplinary committees].
    Hubben JH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Aug; 142(33):1851-3. PubMed ID: 9856163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical Practitioners Disciplinary Committee: professional misconduct findings against Dr D W Steeper.
    N Z Med J; 1990 Apr; 103(888):194-5. PubMed ID: 2330174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statements of competence for practitioners in the clinical laboratory sciences.
    Fiorella BJ; Maturen AJ
    Am J Med Technol; 1981 Aug; 47(8):647-52. PubMed ID: 7197119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Continuing professional development.
    Newton J
    N Z Dent J; 1993 Jan; 89(395):9-12. PubMed ID: 8441514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Views of physicians, disciplinary board members and practicing lawyers on the new statutory disciplinary system for health care in The Netherlands.
    Cuperus-Bosma JM; Hout FA; Hubben JH; van der Wal G
    Health Policy; 2006 Jul; 77(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 16125274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The medical complaints and disciplinary process in New Zealand: doctors' suggestions for change.
    Cunningham W
    N Z Med J; 2004 Jul; 117(1198):U974. PubMed ID: 15326497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Doctors whose competence has been reviewed under the Medical Practitioners Act 1995.
    St George I
    N Z Med J; 2003 Jun; 116(1175):U459. PubMed ID: 12838355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medical professionalism and continuing professional development for medical specialists.
    White P
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Jun; 44(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 15191440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medical Practitioners Disciplinary Committee.
    Shenken L
    N Z Med J; 1988 Apr; 101(843):181. PubMed ID: 3357630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exclusions of problem physicians upheld in two cases.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1997 Dec; 15(2):3-7. PubMed ID: 10175627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From competence to capability: a study of nurse practitioners in clinical practice.
    Gardner A; Hase S; Gardner G; Dunn SV; Carryer J
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Jan; 17(2):250-8. PubMed ID: 17419787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect on medical practice of disciplinary complaints: potentially negative for patient care.
    Cunningham W; Dovey S
    N Z Med J; 2000 Nov; 113(1121):464-7. PubMed ID: 11194753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review for nurses: a model to ensure professional accountability.
    Caine D
    Tar Heel Nurse; 1991; 53(2):3. PubMed ID: 11995546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.