These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6573130)

  • 1. Evaluating pedigree data. I. The estimation of pedigree error in the presence of marker mistyping.
    Lathrop GM; Hooper AB; Huntsman JW; Ward RH
    Am J Hum Genet; 1983 Mar; 35(2):241-62. PubMed ID: 6573130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating pedigree data. II. Identifying the cause of error in families with inconsistencies.
    Lathrop GM; Huntsman JW; Hooper AB; Ward RH
    Hum Hered; 1983; 33(6):377-89. PubMed ID: 6585347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating the frequency of nonpaternity in Switzerland.
    Sasse G; Müller H; Chakraborty R; Ott J
    Hum Hered; 1994; 44(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 7860087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Probability of detection of genotyping errors and mutations as inheritance inconsistencies in nuclear-family data.
    Douglas JA; Skol AD; Boehnke M
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 70(2):487-95. PubMed ID: 11791214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifying marker typing incompatibilities in linkage analysis.
    Stringham HM; Boehnke M
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Oct; 59(4):946-50. PubMed ID: 8808612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Paternity exclusion power: comparative behaviour of autosomal and X-chromosomal markers in standard and deficient cases with inbreeding.
    Pinto N; Gusmão L; Egeland T; Amorim A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Feb; 7(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 23312390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection and integration of genotyping errors in statistical genetics.
    Sobel E; Papp JC; Lange K
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 70(2):496-508. PubMed ID: 11791215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved maximum likelihood reconstruction of complex multi-generational pedigrees.
    Sheehan NA; Bartlett M; Cussens J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2014 Nov; 97():11-9. PubMed ID: 25107832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study of multipoint methods for genotype error detection.
    Mukhopadhyay N; Buxbaum SG; Weeks DE
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):175-89. PubMed ID: 15812175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion.
    Jamieson A; Taylor SC
    Anim Genet; 1997 Dec; 28(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 9616104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Error detection for genetic data, using likelihood methods.
    Ehm MG; Kimmel M; Cottingham RW
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Jan; 58(1):225-34. PubMed ID: 8554060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. DNA-based paternity analysis and genetic evaluation in a large, commercial cattle ranch setting.
    Van Eenennaam AL; Weaber RL; Drake DJ; Penedo MC; Quaas RL; Garrick DJ; Pollak EJ
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3159-69. PubMed ID: 17878282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pedigree generation for analysis of genetic linkage and association.
    Bass MP; Martin ER; Hauser ER
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2004; ():93-103. PubMed ID: 14992495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of complex human genetic traits: an ordered-notation method and new tests for mode of inheritance.
    Thomson G
    Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Aug; 57(2):474-86. PubMed ID: 7668274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of genotyping errors on parentage exclusion analysis.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Nov; 19(22):5061-78. PubMed ID: 20964757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust variance-components approach for assessing genetic linkage in pedigrees.
    Amos CI
    Am J Hum Genet; 1994 Mar; 54(3):535-43. PubMed ID: 8116623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment and management of single nucleotide polymorphism genotype errors in genetic association analysis.
    Gordon D; Ott J
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2001; ():18-29. PubMed ID: 11262939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficient computations in multilocus linkage analysis.
    Lathrop GM; Lalouel JM
    Am J Hum Genet; 1988 Mar; 42(3):498-505. PubMed ID: 3162348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of genotype error rate using samples with pedigree information--an application on the GeneChip Mapping 10K array.
    Hao K; Li C; Rosenow C; Hung Wong W
    Genomics; 2004 Oct; 84(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 15475239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship estimation in affected sib pair analysis of late-onset diseases.
    Göring HH; Ott J
    Eur J Hum Genet; 1997; 5(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 9195155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.