These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6573791)

  • 1. [Bellfirm P for dental amalgam (2). Clinical application of Bellfirm P for posterior restorations].
    Kawahara H; Nakamura M; Ikeda H; Kawata Y; Hikari S; Maeda T; Sakaguchi K; Iseki T; Yokoyama A
    Shikai Tenbo; 1983 Mar; 61(3):487-98. PubMed ID: 6573791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Bellfirm P for de-amalgam. (1)--Clinical application of Bellfirm P for posterior restorations].
    Kawahara H; Imanishi Y; Saijyo A; Yokota S; Yamanaka M; Yata A; Matsumoto A; Saeki S; Kudo T
    Shikai Tenbo; 1983 Feb; 61(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 6377529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of differences in amalgam restorations on examination standardization.
    Cobb DS
    J Dent Educ; 1997 Dec; 61(12):938-40. PubMed ID: 9457136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [6-month clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations].
    Katsatos I; Poulia-Prompona S; Kostes I
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1974; 28(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 4211747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical comparison of composite, amalgam, and silicate restorations.
    Eames WB; Strain JD; Weitman RT; Williams AK
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1974 Nov; 89(5):1111-7. PubMed ID: 4529964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Observations on a composite resin for Class II restorations: three-year report.
    Phillips RW; Avery DR; Mehra R; Swartz ML; McCune RJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1973 Dec; 30(6):891-7. PubMed ID: 4519428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Amalgam. IX. Substitute for amalgam: durability of composite restorations].
    Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 Oct; 100(10):437-41. PubMed ID: 11822139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attacks on amalgam raise moral, ethical questions.
    Swaczyna CH
    CDS Rev; 2006; 99(5):5. PubMed ID: 17039603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rubber dam.
    Kirchner GA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 Nov; 144(11):1220. PubMed ID: 24177393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Authors' response.
    Gordan VV;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 Nov; 144(11):1220, 1222. PubMed ID: 24177394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of the marginal sealing capacity of composite and conventional materials for filling of tissue defects; in vitro studies].
    Wasik A; Bobowicz Z
    Protet Stomatol; 1977; 27(2):175. PubMed ID: 270176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The composite resin restoration: a literature review. Part II. Comparisons between composite and alloy restorations.
    Full CA; Hollander WR
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 8432948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How independent are those independent studies?
    Brandstatter R
    CDS Rev; 2006; 99(5):5. PubMed ID: 17036621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Observations on a composite resin for class II restorations: two-year report.
    Phillips RW; Avery DR; Mehra R; Swartz ML; McCune RJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1972 Aug; 28(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 4504300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Re-intervention in glass ionomer restorations: what comes next?
    Burke FJ; Lucarotti PS
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 18819740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [In vivo wear of posterior composites and its counterplan before or after insertion].
    Hosoda H
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Jun; 52(2):195-209. PubMed ID: 3862715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of in vivo and in vitro microleakage of dental restorations.
    McCurdy CR; Swartz ML; Phillips RW; Rhodes BF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1974 Mar; 88(3):592-602. PubMed ID: 4204384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Adaptation of filling materials on enamel surfaces].
    Suarez Nuñez JM; Varela Nuñez R; Beiras Iglesias A; Vidal Miralles L; Pumar Cebreiro JM
    Rev Esp Estomatol; 1976; 24(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 802312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal adaptation of composite resins.
    Al-Hamadani KK; Crabb HS
    J Oral Rehabil; 1975 Jan; 2(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 49414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.