These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6574182)

  • 1. Gingival response to class V composite resin restorations.
    Dunkin RT; Chambers DW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1983 Apr; 106(4):482-4. PubMed ID: 6574182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The gingival response to well-finished composite resin restorations.
    Blank LW; Caffesse RG; Charbeneau GT
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Dec; 42(6):626-32. PubMed ID: 390121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interleukin-1 levels in gingival crevicular fluid adjacent to restorations of calcium aluminate cement and resin composite.
    Konradsson K; van Dijken JW
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):462-6. PubMed ID: 15842260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A foreign body lesion of the gingiva subsequent to the placement of a composite resin restoration.
    Moore DL; Barker BF
    Quintessence Int; 1986 Dec; 17(12):785-7. PubMed ID: 3468528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The gingival response to well-finished composite resin restorations: a 28-month report.
    Blank LW; Caffesse RG; Charbeneau GT
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Aug; 46(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 6944478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of gingivitis around different types of composite resin.
    van Dijken JW; Sjöström S; Wing K
    J Clin Periodontol; 1987 May; 14(5):257-60. PubMed ID: 3301912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of fiber inserts, type of composite, and gingival margin location on the microleakage in Class II resin composite restorations.
    Dhingra V; Taneja S; Kumar M; Kumari M
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):E9-15. PubMed ID: 23802641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of Isolation Method of the Operative Field on Gingival Damage, Patients' Preference, and Restoration Retention in Noncarious Cervical Lesions.
    Loguercio AD; Luque-Martinez I; Lisboa AH; Higashi C; Queiroz VA; Rego RO; Reis A
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(6):581-93. PubMed ID: 26158415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of gingival wall location on the marginal seal of class ii restorations prepared with a flowable bulk-fill resin-based composite.
    Segal P; Candotto V; Ben-Amar A; Eger M; Matalon S; Lauritano D; Ormianer Z
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2018; 32(2 Suppl. 1):11-18. PubMed ID: 29460513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pulpal effects of composite resin restorations.
    Swift EJ
    Oper Dent; 1989; 14(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 2697860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Posterior composite resin restorations--a review of clinical problems.
    Bryant RW
    Aust Prosthodont J; 1987; 1():41-50. PubMed ID: 3333226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors and prevention of pulp irritation by adhesive composite resin restorations.
    Fusayama T
    Quintessence Int; 1987 Sep; 18(9):633-41. PubMed ID: 3478748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gingival response to veneering with light activated composite resin.
    Al Shammery AR
    Egypt Dent J; 1986 Oct; 32(4):361-72. PubMed ID: 3467964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Marginal leakage of composite resin restorations with cavity lining agents--cases of cervical wedge-shaped defects].
    Hotta M; Murata M; Oguchi K; Hirata K; Noda H; Komatsu S; Watanabe M; Kimura K
    Gifu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Jun; 12(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 3866788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage at gingival margins of Class V composite resin restorations rebonded with various low-viscosity resin systems.
    Tjan AH; Tan DE
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Jul; 22(7):565-73. PubMed ID: 1882051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The composite resin restoration: a literature review. Part II. Comparisons between composite and alloy restorations.
    Full CA; Hollander WR
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 8432948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genotoxicity in gingival cells of patients undergoing tooth restoration with two different dental composite materials.
    Tadin A; Galic N; Mladinic M; Marovic D; Kovacic I; Zeljezic D
    Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan; 18(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 23385426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The prevalence of postoperative sensitivity in teeth restored with Class II composite resin restorations.
    Borgmeijer PJ; Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Gruythuysen RJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1991; 58(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 1939803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage of Class II composite resin restorations with self-adhesive composite resin liners.
    Doozandeh M; Shafiei F; Mohammadi F
    Gen Dent; 2017; 65(4):41-47. PubMed ID: 28682281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.