136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6574432)
1. Effect of designs of Class 2 preparations on resistance of teeth to fracture.
Blaser PK; Lund MR; Cochran MA; Potter RH
Oper Dent; 1983; 8(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 6574432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The Lutz cavity: fracture resistance of enamel unsupported by dentin].
De Luca S; Fabianelli A; Garberoglio R
Dent Cadmos; 1988 Sep; 56(14):34-6, 39-40, 43-4 passim. PubMed ID: 3255628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamometric assessment of the mechanical resistance of porcelain veneers related to tooth preparation: a comparison between two techniques.
Zarone F; Epifania E; Leone G; Sorrentino R; Ferrari M
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 May; 95(5):354-63. PubMed ID: 16679130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Effect of various cavity design, lining and restorative materials on the fracture resistance of teeth].
Zhan F; Zhao M; Li Z
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Jan; 36(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 11812303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture strength of cusp replacing resin composite restorations.
Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 12744406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture resistance in conservative Class II cavity preparation: box vs tunnel.
Khairy MA
Egypt Dent J; 1994 Jul; 40(3):751-6. PubMed ID: 9588153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture resistance of re-attached coronal fragments--influence of different adhesive materials and bevel preparation.
Demarco FF; Fay RM; Pinzon LM; Powers JM
Dent Traumatol; 2004 Jun; 20(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 15144447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.
Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB
Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.
Santos MJ; Bezerra RB
J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite.
Belli S; Erdemir A; Ozcopur M; Eskitascioglu G
Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Influence of cavity preparation on mechanical resistance of teeth].
Lopes LM; Leitão JG; Douglas WH
Rev Port Estomatol Cir Maxilofac; 1991; 31(4):207-13. PubMed ID: 2041972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of cavity design and glass fiber posts on biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars.
Soares CJ; Soares PV; de Freitas Santos-Filho PC; Castro CG; Magalhaes D; Versluis A
J Endod; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1015-9. PubMed ID: 18634938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture strength of the remaining dental structure after different cavity preparation designs.
Teixeira ES; Rizzante FA; Ishikiriama SK; Mondelli J; Furuse AY; Mondelli RF; Bombonatti JF
Gen Dent; 2016; 64(2):33-6. PubMed ID: 26943086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Indirect composite preparation width and depth and tooth fracture resistance.
Watts DC; Wilson NH; Burke FJ
Am J Dent; 1995 Feb; 8(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 7546466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations.
Mondelli J; Steagall L; Ishikiriama A; de Lima Navarro MF; Soares FB
J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Apr; 43(4):419-22. PubMed ID: 6928479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of cavity preparation design on fracture strength and mode of fracture of laboratory-processed composite resin restorations.
Fonseca RB; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Correr-Sobrinho L; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 98(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 17936127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Compressive fracture resistance of the marginal ridge in large Class II tunnels restored with cermet and composite resin.
Ehrnford LE; Fransson H
Swed Dent J; 1994; 18(5):207-11. PubMed ID: 7871480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Protection of the teeth against fractures].
Lagouvardos PE; Douvitsas G
Odontostomatol Proodos; 1985; 39(6):411-6. PubMed ID: 3939474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
