These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6574432)

  • 21. Fracture strength of weakened human premolars restored with amalgam with and without cusp coverage.
    Mondelli RF; Barbosa WF; Mondelli J; Franco EB; Carvalho RM
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 10388373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of prepared cavities on the strength of teeth.
    Larson TD; Douglas WH; Geistfeld RE
    Oper Dent; 1981; 6(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 6941225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Marginal ridge strength of teeth with tunnel preparations.
    Strand GV; Tveit AB; Gjerdet NR; Eide GE
    Int Dent J; 1995 Apr; 45(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 7558348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of maxillary premolars with approximal slot cavities.
    el-Mowafy OM
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 8152985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A conservative approach to the pulpotomy in primary teeth.
    Davina AB
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 9643181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of cavity wall taper on fracture resistance of teeth restored with resin composite inlays.
    Burke FJ; Wilson NH; Watts DC
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(6):230-6. PubMed ID: 8152995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior Leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations.
    Soares CJ; Martins LR; Fonseca RB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Fernandes Neto AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):421-9. PubMed ID: 16765154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations.
    Görücü J; Ozgünaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 14531594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
    Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K
    Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation.
    Burke FJ; Shaglouf AG; Combe EC; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 11203847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of designs of Class 2 preparations on resistance of teeth to fracture.
    Dang N; Meshram GK; Mittal RK
    Indian J Dent Res; 1997; 8(3):90-4. PubMed ID: 9495158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: three walls versus four walls of remaining coronal tooth structure.
    Arunpraditkul S; Saengsanon S; Pakviwat W
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jan; 18(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 19166548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of a new restoration technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
    Sengun A; Cobankara FK; Orucoglu H
    Dent Traumatol; 2008 Apr; 24(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 18352927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Marginal ridge fracture resistance, microleakage and pulpal response to glass ionomer/glass cermet partial tunnel restorations.
    Prabhu NT; Munshi AK; Shetty TR
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 9484134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of ferrule and bonding on the compressive fracture resistance of post and core restorations.
    Dorriz H; Alikhasi M; Mirfazaelian A; Hooshmand T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jan; 10(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 19142250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Resistance to maxillary premolar fractures after restoration of class II preparations with resin composite or ceromer.
    de Freitas CR; Miranda MI; de Andrade MF; Flores VH; Vaz LG; Guimarães C
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Sep; 33(8):589-94. PubMed ID: 12238690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the effect of different ferrule designs on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors incorporating fiber posts, composite cores and crown restorations.
    Dikbas I; Tanalp J; Ozel E; Koksal T; Ersoy M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Nov; 8(7):62-9. PubMed ID: 17994156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
    Qualtrough AJ; Cawte SG; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fracture resistance of thermal cycled and endodontically treated premolars with adhesive restorations.
    de V Habekost L; Camacho GB; Azevedo EC; Demarco FF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 17854619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.