These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6575125)
1. Endosseous porous polysulfone dental implants. Kuo YS; Masuara E Taiwan Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi; 1983 Jan; 82(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 6575125 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Biocompatibility of polysulfone composite materials for dental implant. Kuo YS Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1977 Sep; 24(3):223-31. PubMed ID: 269029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Experimental studies on the polysulfone tooth implants (author's transl)]. Horiuchi A; Kuo YS; Kasuga H; Watanabe A; Imai Y Tokyo Ika Shika Daigaku Iyo Kizai Kenkyusho Hokoku; 1977; 11():37-42. PubMed ID: 284537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Three years evaluation of the polysulfone and poly (methyl methacrylate) tooth implants (author's transl)]. Masuhara E; Chang PI; Kuo YS; Watanabe A; Imai Y Tokyo Ika Shika Daigaku Iyo Kizai Kenkyusho Hokoku; 1981; 15():31-6. PubMed ID: 6955908 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Osteoinduction within porous polysulfone implants at extraosseous sites using demineralized allogeneic bone matrix. Vandersteenhoven JJ; Spector M J Biomed Mater Res; 1983 Sep; 17(5):793-806. PubMed ID: 6619176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A high-modulus polymer for porous orthopedic implants: biomechanical compatibility of porous implants. Spector M; Michno MJ; Smarook WH; Kwiatkowski GT J Biomed Mater Res; 1978 Sep; 12(5):665-77. PubMed ID: 701302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between endosseous metal blade-vent and endosseous polymer-coated metal blade-vent implants when used as distal abutment for removable appliances in free-end saddle cases. El-Mahady AS; Amin M; Fahmy TH; Abbas NA Egypt Dent J; 1984 Apr; 30(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 6399032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [The use of porous polysulfone as a new material for implantation into the orbit]. Pisarev VB; Mukhaev KhKh; Brel' AK Biull Eksp Biol Med; 1996 Jun; 121(6):707-10. PubMed ID: 9035773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A small animal model for investigating endosseous dental implants: effect of graft materials on healing of endosseous, porous-surfaced implants placed in a fresh extraction socket. Todescan R; Pilliar RM; Melcher AH Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1987; 2(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 3333645 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Dental implants as treatment of choice: beneficial, predictable, and straightforward. Gelb DA Dent Today; 2005 Feb; 24(2):112, 114-7. PubMed ID: 15768944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Endopore: a new generation of implants]. Albert FE; Bergeron CA J Can Dent Assoc; 1998 May; 64(5):370-3. PubMed ID: 9648419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Polysulfone corneal inlays. Adverse reactions: a preliminary report. Kirkness CM; Steele AD; Garner A Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K (1962); 1985; 104 ( Pt 3)():343-50. PubMed ID: 3861013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Solcoseryl Dental Adhesive Paste in the treatment of the oral mucosal wounds following the implantation of endosseous implants]. Porteder H; Henning G Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1997; 76(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 9245003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Porous surfaced endosseous dental implants: fixation by bone ingrowth. Pilliar RM Univ Tor Dent J; 1988; 1(2):10-5. PubMed ID: 3053155 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [In vitro study on biocompatibility evaluation of polysulfone resin]. Iijima K; Itakura Y; Niida S; Ohoke S; Matsuzawa J; Ohno T Tohoku Shika Daigaku Gakkai Shi; 1987 Mar; 14(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 3504815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection times of natural teeth and endosseous implants revealed by the method of reaction time. Mattes S; Ulrich R; Mühlbradt L Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(3):399-402. PubMed ID: 9197106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]