These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6575341)

  • 41. [Studies comparing the efficacy of root canal filling with gutta-percha lateral condensation and Thermafil obturators].
    Lipski M
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2000; 46():317-30. PubMed ID: 11712315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. In vitro study of microbial leakage in roots filled with EndoREZ sealer/EndoREZ Points and AH Plus sealer/conventional gutta-percha points.
    Drukteinis S; Peciuliene V; Maneliene R; Bendinskaite R
    Stomatologija; 2009; 11(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 19423967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. MTA and F-doped MTA cements used as sealers with warm gutta-percha. Long-term study of sealing ability.
    Gandolfi MG; Prati C
    Int Endod J; 2010 Oct; 43(10):889-901. PubMed ID: 20618878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Apical seal of roots obturated with laterally condensed gutta-percha, epoxy resin cement, and dentin bonding agent.
    Mannocci F; Ferrari M
    J Endod; 1998 Jan; 24(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 9487866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Bond strength of Resilon/Epiphany compared with Gutta-percha and sealers Sealer 26 and Endo Fill.
    Cecchin D; Souza M; Carlini-Júnior B; Barbizam JV
    Aust Endod J; 2012 Apr; 38(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 22432822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparative tissue tolerance of a new endodontic sealer.
    Molloy D; Goldman M; White RR; Kabani S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Apr; 73(4):490-3. PubMed ID: 1533448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Endodontic update: biologic and physico-chemical properties of commonly used root canal filling materials.
    Ellison RL; Corcoran JF; Zillich RM
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 1983 Mar; 65(3):125-31. PubMed ID: 6343607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Clinical evaluation of the Hydron burn dressing.
    Warren RJ; Snelling CF
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1980 Sep; 66(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 7422723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Sealing ability of oval-shaped canals filled using the System B heat source with either gutta-percha or Resilon: an ex vivo study using a polymicrobial leakage model.
    De-Deus G; Audi C; Murad C; Fidel S; Fidel RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Oct; 104(4):e114-9. PubMed ID: 17656119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of tissue reaction to endodontic materials.
    Safavi KE; Pascon EA; Langeland K
    J Endod; 1983 Oct; 9(10):421-9. PubMed ID: 6579167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Fracture resistance of roots filled with gutta-percha or RealSeal®.
    Lertchirakarn V; Poonkaew A; Messer H
    Int Endod J; 2011 Nov; 44(11):1005-10. PubMed ID: 21899563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Tissue response to an acrylic reinforced gutta percha.
    Nicholson RJ; Nguyen NT; Merrill PW; Casanova F
    CDA J; 1979 Sep; 7(9):55-7. PubMed ID: 296901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An evaluation of .06 tapered gutta-percha cones for filling of .06 taper prepared curved root canals.
    Gordon MP; Love RM; Chandler NP
    Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 15667630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Accuracy of two root canal length measurement devices integrated into rotary endodontic motors when removing gutta-percha from root-filled teeth.
    Uzun O; Topuz O; Tinaz C; Nekoofar MH; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 2008 Sep; 41(9):725-32. PubMed ID: 18637852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Ex-vivo area-metric analysis of root canal obturation using gutta-percha cones of different taper.
    Romania C; Beltes P; Boutsioukis C; Dandakis C
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jun; 42(6):491-8. PubMed ID: 19460000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of the interface between gutta-percha and two types of sealers using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
    Eltair M; Pitchika V; Hickel R; Kühnisch J; Diegritz C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 May; 22(4):1631-1639. PubMed ID: 29080076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Biological evaluation in the subcutaneous connective tissue of rats using implants of polyethylene tubes containing cavity varnishes (Pulpo Cal, Tubulidrox, Cavity Lining and Copalite)].
    de Silva Filho FP; Lia RC; Brancini MR; Sposto MR
    Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent; 1981; 35(5):398-407. PubMed ID: 6947344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. In vivo evaluation of the biocompatibility of a new resin-based obturation system.
    Onay EO; Ungor M; Ozdemir BH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Sep; 104(3):e60-6. PubMed ID: 17618139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Connective tissue reactions to 3% tetracycline ointment in rat skin.
    Eslami A; Van Swol RL; Sadeghi EM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1987 Oct; 45(10):866-72. PubMed ID: 3477622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Connective tissue formation in subcutaneous cellulose sponge implants in the rat. The effect of the size and cellulose content of the implant.
    Märtson M; Viljanto J; Laippala P; Saukko P
    Eur Surg Res; 1998; 30(6):419-25. PubMed ID: 9838235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.