BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6575639)

  • 1. Current distributions in cochlear stimulation.
    Black RC; Clark GM; Tong YC; Patrick JF
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():137-45. PubMed ID: 6575639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design, construction and mechanical optimisation process of electrode with radial current flow in the scala tympani.
    Deman PR; Kaiser TM; Dirckx JJ; Offeciers FE; Peeters SA
    J Neurosci Methods; 2003 Sep; 128(1-2):143-50. PubMed ID: 12948557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve using high surface area (HiQ) platinum electrodes.
    Tykocinski M; Duan Y; Tabor B; Cowan RS
    Hear Res; 2001 Sep; 159(1-2):53-68. PubMed ID: 11520634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional spiraling finite element model of the electrically stimulated cochlea.
    Hanekom T
    Ear Hear; 2001 Aug; 22(4):300-15. PubMed ID: 11527037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrical impedance measurements of cochlear structures using the four-electrode reflection-coefficient technique.
    Kumar G; Chokshi M; Richter CP
    Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):86-94. PubMed ID: 19857561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of electrical current configuration on potential fields in the electrically stimulated cochlea: field models and measurements.
    Spelman FA; Pfingst BE; Clopton BM; Jolly CN; Rodenhiser KL
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():131-6. PubMed ID: 7668604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory prosthesis with a penetrating nerve array.
    Middlebrooks JC; Snyder RL
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Jun; 8(2):258-79. PubMed ID: 17265124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Impedance of cochlear implant electrode array in scalae tympani].
    Du Q; Wang ZM
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 88(46):3302-4. PubMed ID: 19159560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current distributions in the cat cochlea: a modelling and electrophysiological study.
    O'Leary SJ; Black RC; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1985 Jun; 18(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 3840160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spiral ganglion cell site of excitation I: comparison of scala tympani and intrameatal electrode responses.
    Cartee LA; Miller CA; van den Honert C
    Hear Res; 2006 May; 215(1-2):10-21. PubMed ID: 16624511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron. II. Influence of the three-dimensional cochlear structure on neural excitability.
    Rattay F; Leao RN; Felix H
    Hear Res; 2001 Mar; 153(1-2):64-79. PubMed ID: 11223297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
    Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of half-band and full-band electrodes for intracochlear electrical stimulation.
    Xu SA; McAnally KI; Xu J; Clark GM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1993 May; 102(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8489166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differential electrical excitation of the auditory nerve.
    Black RC; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Mar; 67(3):868-74. PubMed ID: 6892642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impedance Changes and Fibrous Tissue Growth after Cochlear Implantation Are Correlated and Can Be Reduced Using a Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode.
    Wilk M; Hessler R; Mugridge K; Jolly C; Fehr M; Lenarz T; Scheper V
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0147552. PubMed ID: 26840740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: a model approach.
    Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 214(1-2):17-27. PubMed ID: 16520009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Protocol for determining the auditory percepts of electrical stimulation of the cochlea.
    Michelson RP; Schubert E; Walsh S; White M
    Laryngoscope; 1979 May; 89(5 Pt 1):748-51. PubMed ID: 449518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulation of the facial nerve by intracochlear electrodes in otosclerosis: a computer modeling study.
    Frijns JH; Kalkman RK; Briaire JJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Dec; 30(8):1168-74. PubMed ID: 19574948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impulse patterns of auditory nerve fibres to extra- and intracochlear electrical stimulation.
    Hartmann R; Klinke R
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():128-34. PubMed ID: 2162619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.