These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6575639)

  • 21. Tissue impedance and current flow in the implanted ear. Implications for the cochlear prosthesis.
    Spelman FA; Clopton BM; Pfingst BE
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 98():3-8. PubMed ID: 6814331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Determinants of the effectiveness of electric stimulation of the auditory nerve with cochlear implants: II. Configuration of the stimulating electrodes].
    Kral A; Hartmann R; Klinke R
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2000; 101(3):170-2. PubMed ID: 10870263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Investigations towards an artificial cochlea.
    Hochmair ES; Hochmair-Desoyer IJ; Burian K
    Int J Artif Organs; 1979 Sep; 2(5):255-61. PubMed ID: 582589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Determinants of the effectiveness of cochlear implants: I. Placement in the cochlea].
    Kral A; Hartmann R; Klinke R
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2000; 101(2):112-4. PubMed ID: 11039219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cochlear or nerve stimulation.
    White RL
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Jan; 10(1 Pt 2):232-6. PubMed ID: 2436184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of site of stimulation on the guinea pig's electrically evoked brain stem response.
    Marsh RR; Yamane H; Potsic WP
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1981; 89(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 6784070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Development of an electrode for the artificial cochlear sensory epithelium.
    Tona Y; Inaoka T; Ito J; Kawano S; Nakagawa T
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):106-12. PubMed ID: 26299844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The effect of high-rate electrical stimulation on excitability of auditory nerve in Guinea pigs].
    Liu A; Wang Z; Cui Y; Zhou L; Chi F
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2005 May; 19(10):454-6, 460. PubMed ID: 16108323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modelling the effects of cochlear implant current focusing.
    Saba R; Elliott SJ; Wang S
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Nov; 15(6):318-26. PubMed ID: 25118009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants: a preclinical safety study.
    Shepherd RK; Wise AK; Enke YL; Carter PM; Fallon JB
    J Neural Eng; 2017 Aug; 14(4):046020. PubMed ID: 28607224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Focused electrical stimulation using a single current source.
    Senn P; Shepherd RK; Fallon JB
    J Neural Eng; 2018 Oct; 15(5):056018. PubMed ID: 29967310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biophysical measurements in the implanted cochlea.
    Spelman FA; Pfingst BE; Miller JM; Hassul M; Powers WE; Clopton BM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1979); 1980; 88(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 6773014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Physiologic identification of eighth nerve subdivisions: direct recordings with bipolar and monopolar electrodes.
    Nguyen BH; Javel E; Levine SC
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):522-34. PubMed ID: 10431897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Current distributions produced inside and outside the cochlea from a scala tympani electrode array.
    Ifukube T; White RL
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1987 Nov; 34(11):883-90. PubMed ID: 3692506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cochlear pathology with chronically implanted scala tympani electrodes.
    Leake-Jones PA; Rebscher SJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():203-23. PubMed ID: 6575646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. I. Intensity dependence of firing rate and response latency.
    Raggio MW; Schreiner CE
    J Neurophysiol; 1994 Nov; 72(5):2334-59. PubMed ID: 7884463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Focused intracochlear electric stimulation with phased array channels.
    van den Honert C; Kelsall DC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jun; 121(6):3703-16. PubMed ID: 17552721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Implanted material tolerance studies for a multiple-channel cochlear prosthesis.
    Shepherd RK; Webb RL; Clark GM; Pyman BC; Hirshorn MS; Murray MT; Houghton ME
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():71-81. PubMed ID: 6441446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of electrode configuration and place of stimulation on speech perception with cochlear prostheses.
    Pfingst BE; Franck KH; Xu L; Bauer EM; Zwolan TA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2001 Jun; 2(2):87-103. PubMed ID: 11550528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [The location of inserting the electrode into the cochlear].
    Zhang DX
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2000 May; 14(5):195-6. PubMed ID: 12541539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.