These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6575652)

  • 1. Speech perception with promontory stimulation.
    Fourcin AJ; Douek EE; Moore BC; Rosen S; Walliker JR; Howard DM; Abberton E; Frampton S
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():280-94. PubMed ID: 6575652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of the promontory stimulation test for the preoperative evaluation of cochlear implants: a comparison with the round window stimulation test.
    Ito J; Tsuji J; Sakakihara J
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1994; 21(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 7980189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The contribution of apical stimulation to Mandarin speech perception in users of the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Qi B; Liu B; Krenmayr A; Liu S; Gong S; Liu H; Zhang N; Han D
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jan; 131(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 20863152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictive factors for success with a cochlear implant.
    van Dijk JE; van Olphen AF; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P; Smoorenburg GF
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():196-8. PubMed ID: 7668634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Study on the effect of the number of electrodes programmed and the area of stimulation in cochlear implant patients.
    Naito A; Kitano Y; Iida M; Ishida K; Sakai M; Koga K
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():412-6. PubMed ID: 11892204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Rehabilitation of hearing-impaired patients with cochlear implants: a review].
    Gstoettner W; Adunka O; Hamzavi J; Baumgartner WD
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):464-72. PubMed ID: 10890122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Results and perspectives with extracochlear round window electrodes.
    Dillier N; Spillmann T
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():221-9. PubMed ID: 6596846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic value of round-window psychophysical testing with cochlear-implant candidates.
    Shipp DB; Nedzelski JM
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Jun; 23(3):172-6. PubMed ID: 8064955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Round window versus promontory stimulation: assessment for cochlear implant candidacy.
    Shipp DB; Nedzelski JM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1991 Nov; 100(11):889-92. PubMed ID: 1746821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extracochlear electrical stimulation.
    Gundersen T; Ramírez-García E; Randa J
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 6719013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Technique and indications for the French multichannel cochlear implant "Chorimac-12" for total deafness rehabilitation.
    Chouard CH; Fugain C; Meyer B
    Am J Otol; 1985 Jul; 6(4):291-4. PubMed ID: 3839632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Chorimac-12. A multichannel cochlear implant for total deafness. Description and clinical results.
    Chouard CH; Fugain C; Meyer B; Chabolle F
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1985; 39(4):735-48. PubMed ID: 3841455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech pattern element stimulation in electrical hearing.
    Fourcin A; Douek E; Moore B; Abberton E; Rosen S; Walliker J
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1984 Mar; 110(3):145-53. PubMed ID: 6546682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive factors in cochlear implants.
    Albu S; Babighian G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1997; 51(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 9105476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic, aerodynamic, and perceptual analyses of the voice of cochlear-implanted children.
    Guerrero Lopez HA; Mondain M; Amy de la Bretèque B; Serrafero P; Trottier C; Barkat-Defradas M
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):523.e1-17. PubMed ID: 23809572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychophysical and speech perception studies: a case report on a binaural cochlear implant subject.
    van Hoesel RJ; Tong YC; Hollow RD; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3178-89. PubMed ID: 8300953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition at simulated soft, conversational, and raised-to-loud vocal efforts by adults with cochlear implants.
    Skinner MW; Holden LK; Holden TA; Demorest ME; Fourakis MS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3766-82. PubMed ID: 9193063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic indicators of speech recognition performance in adult cochlear implant users: a prospective analysis.
    Shipp DB; Nedzelski JM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():194-6. PubMed ID: 7668633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of round-window and transtympanic promontory electric stimulation in cochlear implant candidates.
    Kileny PR; Zwolan TA; Zimmerman-Phillips S; Kemink JL
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):294-9. PubMed ID: 1487088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech recognition under conditions of frequency-place compression and expansion.
    Baskent D; Shannon RV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2064-76. PubMed ID: 12703717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.