These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6576317)

  • 1. The integral dose in panoramic intraoral x-ray tube radiography.
    Hayami A; Fujishita M; Sumida A; Kanke M; Fujiki T; Uemura S; Fuchihata H
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Jul; 56(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 6576317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations.
    Granlund C; Thilander-Klang A; Ylhan B; Lofthag-Hansen S; Ekestubbe A
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20151052. PubMed ID: 27452261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thyroid dose distribution in dental radiography.
    Bristow RG; Wood RE; Clark GM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Oct; 68(4):482-7. PubMed ID: 2797745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A leaded apron for use in panoramic dental radiography.
    Whitcher BL; Gratt BM; Sickles EA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1980 May; 49(5):467-70. PubMed ID: 6929470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiation-absorbed doses and energy imparted from panoramic tomography, cephalometric radiography, and occlusal film radiography in children.
    Bankvall G; Håkansson HA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 May; 53(5):532-40. PubMed ID: 6954429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Panoramic radiography using an intraoral tube. Method, anatomy, radiography and dosimetry].
    Bianchi SD; Bonifacino M; Serrallonga M
    Minerva Stomatol; 1998 Apr; 47(4):169-81. PubMed ID: 9617129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 13679353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
    Molander B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Absorbed doses from intraoral radiography with special emphasis on collimator dimensions.
    Stenström B; Henrikson CO; Holm B; Richter S
    Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(1-2):59-71. PubMed ID: 3458320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of radiation geometry and radiation doses during radiography with an intraoral x-ray tube (Philips Stat ORALIX).
    Blomgren PG; Hollender L; Molander B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1978; 7(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 291551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dose contributions to the Swedish population from oral radiography.
    Stenström B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1986; 40():1-62. PubMed ID: 3467441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trends in Estimated Thyroid, Salivary Gland, Brain, and Eye Lens Doses From Intraoral Dental Radiography Over Seven Decades (1940 TO 2009).
    Fontana RC; Pasqual E; Miller DL; Simon SL; Cardis E; Thierry-Chef I
    Health Phys; 2020 Feb; 118(2):136-148. PubMed ID: 31634260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dose reduction by field size trimming in rotational panoramic radiography.
    Svanaes DB; Larheim TA; Backe S
    Scand J Dent Res; 1985 Feb; 93(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 3856929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiation doses in examination of lower third molars with computed tomography and conventional radiography.
    Ohman A; Kull L; Andersson J; Flygare L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):445-52. PubMed ID: 19033429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oblique lateral radiographs and bitewings; estimation of organ doses in head and neck region with Monte Carlo calculations.
    Aps JK; Scott JM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20130419. PubMed ID: 24834483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Doses to patients from pantomographic and conventional dental radiography.
    Wall BF; Fisher ES; Paynter R; Hudson A; Bird PD
    Br J Radiol; 1979 Sep; 52(621):727-34. PubMed ID: 476387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part II: Occupational exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Debaveye D; Bogaerts R; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 15897285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; White SC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Sep; 139(9):1237-43. PubMed ID: 18762634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Must radiation dose for CT of the maxilla and mandible be higher than that for conventional panoramic radiography?
    Diederichs CG; Engelke WG; Richter B; Hermann KP; Oestmann JW
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1996 Oct; 17(9):1758-60. PubMed ID: 8896633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Four-intraoral film radiographic examination on children imparting less radiation than pantomography.
    Locht S
    Scand J Dent Res; 1982 Feb; 90(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 6952548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.