BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6576411)

  • 21. [The application of various simple measures to promote radiation hygiene during X-ray exposure: the situation after 10 years].
    Arnold LV
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1984 Nov; 91(11):460-6. PubMed ID: 6597354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The new Kodak Ektaspeed dental x-ray film.
    Silha RE
    Dent Radiogr Photogr; 1981; 54(2):32-5. PubMed ID: 6943097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of time and exposure to air on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of three rapid dental film processing solutions.
    Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE; Prinsloo NJ; Swart NG
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1993 Jan; 48(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 9511608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The use of x-ray film by dental professionals in the United States.
    Platin E
    Tex Dent J; 2002 May; 119(5):396-400, 402. PubMed ID: 12046402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparing the sensitometric properties of dental X-ray films.
    Wakoh M; Farman AG; Kelly MS; Kuroyanagi K
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Mar; 126(3):341-4. PubMed ID: 7897103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Densitometric comparisons of Ultra-speed, Ektaspeed, and Ektaspeed Plus intraoral films for two processing conditions.
    Ludlow JB; Platin E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 7614148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Comparative study of Agfa-Gavaert, Kodak Ultra-Speed and Kodak Ektaspeed dental radiographic films, processed in Sillib solution].
    Capelozza AL; Alvares LC
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1990; 4(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 2135356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Survey of bite-wing entrance surface exposures for dental X-ray generators.
    Holloway AF; McFarlane DJ
    Ont Dent; 1984 Feb; 61(2):23-6, 29. PubMed ID: 6591105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of developer exhaustion on Kodak EKTASPEED Plus, Ektaspeed, and Ultra-speed dental films.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 7614150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Significant results of an information survey of radiation doses of dental equipment in the United States, 1973-1976. The DENT-program: (Dental Exposure Normalization Technique)].
    Crabtree CL
    Med Hyg (Geneve); 1981 Oct; 39(1440):3317-23. PubMed ID: 6948150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A laboratory evaluation of Ektaspeed Plus dental X-ray film.
    Horner K; Rushton VE; Shearer AC
    J Dent; 1995 Dec; 23(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 8530727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Investigation of X-ray apparatus in dental clinics in Yokosuka and Suntoh areas].
    Saito Y; Kanno M; Kashima I; Higashi T
    Kanagawa Shigaku; 1987 Jun; 22(1):184-200. PubMed ID: 3269420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modernizing your office for oral radiography.
    Preece JW
    Tex Dent J; 1995 Feb; 112(2):23, 25, 27-9. PubMed ID: 8633302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Kodak Ektaspeed.
    Farman AG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Jul; 126(7):823-4. PubMed ID: 7503880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Radiation physics and radiation hygiene in use of dental X-ray units. Radiation hygiene. 3].
    Moe AJ
    Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1973 Dec; 83(11):486-92. PubMed ID: 4520204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dental radiographic exposure normalization program (DENT). The experience in Nassau County, NY.
    Goren AD; Sciubba JJ; Moskowitz GW; Mehta S; Theesfeld RL
    N Y State Dent J; 1993; 59(7):49-51. PubMed ID: 8371883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Radiographic contrast. A comparative study of three dental X-ray films.
    Tamburus JR; Lavrador MA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul; 26(4):201-5. PubMed ID: 9442609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Dosimetry during use of dental teleradiography with positive Polaroid TPX radiographic film. (Comparison with a traditional negative radiographic film)].
    Pellerin Y; Le Denmat D
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1985; 14(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 3866281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Two dental x-ray films compared for rater preference using endodontic views.
    Kleier DJ; Benner SJ; Averbach RE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Feb; 59(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 3885130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mail survey of dental radiographic techniques and radiation doses in Greece.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC; Tsiklakis K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Nov; 27(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 10895629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.