These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6577158)

  • 21. Comparative elasticity tests for elastomeric (non putty) impression materials.
    Blomberg PA; Mahmood S; Smales RJ; Makinson OF
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Oct; 37(5):346-52. PubMed ID: 1444955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dimensional stability of seven elastomeric impression materials immersed in disinfectants.
    Thouati A; Deveaux E; Iost A; Behin P
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Jul; 76(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 8814627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Flow profile of regular and fast-setting elastomeric impression materials using a shark fin testing device.
    Lawson NC; Cakir D; Ramp L; Burgess JO
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 21649832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A modified technique to determine the tear energy of impression materials.
    Vrijhoef MM; Lourens FL; Leydekkersgovers GF
    J Oral Rehabil; 1986 Jul; 13(4):325-8. PubMed ID: 3463721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hydrophilicity of elastomeric non-aqueous impression materials during setting.
    Rupp F; Axmann D; Jacobi A; Groten M; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Dent Mater; 2005 Feb; 21(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 15681007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effectiveness of Disinfectants on Antimicrobial and Physical Properties of Dental Impression Materials.
    Demajo JK; Cassar V; Farrugia C; Millan-Sango D; Sammut C; Valdramidis V; Camilleri J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 26757331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Defects in automixed addition silicone elastomers prepared by putty-wash impression technique.
    Soh G; Chong YH
    J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Nov; 18(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 1762027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
    Forrester-Baker L; Seymour KG; Samarawickrama D; Zou L; Cherukara G; Patel M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Surface quality and long-term dimensional stability of current elastomeric impression materials after disinfection.
    Walker MP; Rondeau M; Petrie C; Tasca A; Williams K
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(5):343-51. PubMed ID: 17559536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of the compatibility of elastomeric impression materials, type IV dental stones, and liquid media.
    Gerrow JD; Schneider RL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Mar; 57(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 3553549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An evaluation of selected vinyl polysiloxane and vinyl polysiloxane-hybrid elastomeric impression materials.
    Megremis S; Tiba A; Vogt K; Geary R; Kuehne J
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Apr; 143(4):405-6. PubMed ID: 22467705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinically oriented evaluation of the accuracy of commonly used impression materials.
    Tjan AH; Whang SB; Tjan AH; Sarkissian R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Jul; 56(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 3522878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Compatibility of a new epoxy resin with impression materials.
    Schelb E; Baracat SA; Almaguer R
    Am J Dent; 1990 Aug; 3(4):171-4. PubMed ID: 2076244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The setting of vinyl polysiloxane and condensation silicone putties when mixed with gloved hands.
    Reitz CD; Clark NP
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1988 Mar; 116(3):371-5. PubMed ID: 3162493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of a new ring-opening metathesis elastomeric dental impression material with spray and immersion disinfection.
    Kronström MH; Johnson GH; Hompesch RW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20105678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Working time of elastomeric impression materials.
    Ohsawa M; Finger W
    Dent Mater; 1986 Aug; 2(4):179-82. PubMed ID: 3462065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Surface porosity of stone casts resulting from immersion of addition silicone rubber impressions in disinfectant solutions.
    Hiraguchi H; Kaketani M; Hirose H; Kikuchi H; Yoneyama T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(6):567-9. PubMed ID: 25390872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Some parameters for testing deformation of elastomeric impression materials.
    Blomberg PA; Mahmood S; Smales RJ; Makinson OF
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Aug; 37(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 1444946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of mixing ratio on properties of elastomeric dental impression materials.
    Finger W; Ohsawa M
    Dent Mater; 1986 Aug; 2(4):183-6. PubMed ID: 3462066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.