BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6578662)

  • 1. Comparisons of chewing patterns in patients with bridges supported on osseointegrated implants and subjects with natural dentitions.
    Haraldson T
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1983 Aug; 41(4):203-8. PubMed ID: 6578662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Muscle function during chewing and swallowing in patients with osseointegrated oral implant bridges. An electromyographic study.
    Haraldson T; Ingervall B
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1979; 37(4):207-16. PubMed ID: 291277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Functional state, bite force and postural muscle activity in patients with osseointegrated oral implant bridges.
    Haraldson T; Carlsson GE; Ingervall B
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1979; 37(4):195-206. PubMed ID: 291276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of osseointegrated implants on the coordination of masticatory muscles: a pilot study.
    Gartner JL; Mushimoto K; Weber HP; Nishimura I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Aug; 84(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 10946336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in masticatory movement parameters within the chewing period in young dentate persons and patients rehabilitated with bridges supported by implants in the mandible.
    Jemt T
    J Oral Rehabil; 1986 Sep; 13(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 3464725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electromyographic analysis of masticatory and neck muscles in subjects with natural dentition, teeth-supported and implant-supported prostheses.
    Tartaglia GM; Testori T; Pallavera A; Marelli B; Sforza C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1081-8. PubMed ID: 18828826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of age and dental status on chewing behaviour studied by EMG recordings during consumption of various food samples.
    Kohyama K; Mioche L; Bourdiol P
    Gerodontology; 2003 Jul; 20(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 12926747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: evaluation of masticatory function.
    Feine JS; Maskawi K; de Grandmont P; Donohue WB; Tanguay R; Lund JP
    J Dent Res; 1994 Oct; 73(10):1646-56. PubMed ID: 7929979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oral function in patients wearing fixed prosthesis on osseointegrated implants in the maxilla: 3-year follow-up study.
    Lundqvist S; Haraldson T
    Scand J Dent Res; 1992 Oct; 100(5):279-83. PubMed ID: 1411271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A within-subject comparison of mandibular long-bar and hybrid implant-supported prostheses: evaluation of masticatory function.
    Tang L; Lund JP; Taché R; Clokie CM; Feine JS
    J Dent Res; 1999 Sep; 78(9):1544-53. PubMed ID: 10512389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individuality of masticatory performance and of masticatory muscle temporal parameters.
    Tewksbury CD; Callaghan KX; Fulks BA; Gerstner GE
    Arch Oral Biol; 2018 Jun; 90():113-124. PubMed ID: 29597061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is the goal of mastication reached in young dentates, aged dentates and aged denture wearers?
    Mishellany-Dutour A; Renaud J; Peyron MA; Rimek F; Woda A
    Br J Nutr; 2008 Jan; 99(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 17666149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On occlusal forces in dentitions with implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses.
    Falk H
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1990; 69():1-40. PubMed ID: 2196708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of occlusal scheme on masticatory forces using implant stabilized bridges.
    Hobkirk JA; Brouziotou-Davas E
    J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Jun; 23(6):386-91. PubMed ID: 8809692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationships between chewing rate, occlusion, cephalometric anatomy, muscle activity, and masticatory performance.
    Fulks BA; Callaghan KX; Tewksbury CD; Gerstner GE
    Arch Oral Biol; 2017 Nov; 83():161-168. PubMed ID: 28780385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Studies of biologic parameters for denture design. Part I. Comparison of masseter muscle activity during chewing of crisp and soggy wafers in denture and dentition groups.
    Kapur KK
    J Prosthet Dent; 1975 Mar; 33(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 1089781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Occlusal force pattern during mastication in dentitions with mandibular fixed partial dentures supported on osseointegrated implants.
    Lundgren D; Laurell L; Falk H; Bergendal T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Aug; 58(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 3476727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Masticatory tooth contact patterns: cuspid and first molar contacts during mastication of three types of food.
    Mohamed SE; Harrison JD; Christensen LV
    Cranio; 1996 Oct; 14(4):266-73. PubMed ID: 9110620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of dental status on masticatory muscle activity in elderly patients.
    Alajbeg IZ; Valentic-Peruzovic M; Alajbeg I; Illes D; Celebic A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 16052789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of video versus electromyography for chewing evaluation of the elderly wearing a complete denture.
    Nicolas E; Veyrune JL; Lassauzay C; Peyron MA; Hennequin M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Aug; 34(8):566-71. PubMed ID: 17650166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.