These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6578681)

  • 21. Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Bergé SJ; Swennen GR; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 67(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 19070753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Digital radiology with storage phosphors in cephalometric study in orthodontics].
    Calderazzi A; Palla L; Battolla L; Caramella D; Barbieri L
    Radiol Med; 1992 Sep; 84(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 1410666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. From 2-dimensional cephalograms to 3-dimensional computed tomography scans.
    Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 May; 127(5):627-37. PubMed ID: 15877045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Electronic measuring and calculating devices for arcogrammetric model diagnosis and for the interpretation of teleradiographs].
    Gebauer U
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1977 Nov; 87(11):1170-80. PubMed ID: 271359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Direct digital extraoral radiography of the head and neck with a solid-state linear x-ray detector.
    McDavid WD; Dove SB; Welander U; Tronje G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Dec; 74(6):811-7. PubMed ID: 1488240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reproducibility of three-dimensional posterior cranial base angles using low-dose computed tomography.
    Olszewski R; Frison L; Schoenarts N; Khonsari RH; Odri GA; Zech F; Reychler H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Nov; 21(8):2407-2414. PubMed ID: 28004246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of cephalometry in measurements of postoperative migration of the maxilla after Le Fort I osteotomy.
    Wall G; Rosenquist B
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 9046632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantitative facial asymmetry: using three-dimensional photogrammetry to measure baseline facial surface symmetry.
    Taylor HO; Morrison CS; Linden O; Phillips B; Chang J; Byrne ME; Sullivan SR; Forrest CR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 24406564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A reliable positioning device for dorsoventral cephalometric radiography of the rat.
    de Oliveira RS; de Oliveira Guerra M; Peters VM; Vitral RW
    Lab Anim (NY); 2008 Mar; 37(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 18292775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Optimization analysis for plane orientation in 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis of serial cone-beam computerized tomography images.
    Lagravère MO; Secanell M; Major PW; Carey JP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Jun; 111(6):771-7. PubMed ID: 21569990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Technical note: 3D from standard digital photography of human crania-a preliminary assessment.
    Katz D; Friess M
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2014 May; 154(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 24711122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Method selection in craniofacial measurements: advantages and disadvantages of 3D digitization method.
    Ozsoy U; Demirel BM; Yildirim FB; Tosun O; Sarikcioglu L
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 19179087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of rare earth intensifying screens in cephalometric radiography.
    Stathopoulos V; Poulton DR
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 2180348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Utility of three-dimensional soft tissue facial morphometry and conventional cephalometrics in people with normal occlusion].
    Guo H; Luo S; Bai Y
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Aug; 21(4):314-7. PubMed ID: 14513594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The effect of conical radiographic projection: a study in 3D].
    Kouame P; Rousset MM; Dubus JP; Amanthi D
    Odontostomatol Trop; 1999 Sep; 22(87):5-11. PubMed ID: 11372156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A dual sensitivity screen system for TMJ image enhancement in cephalometric radiography: sensitometric evaluation.
    Wakoh M; Farman AG; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K; Scarfe WC; Braun S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Aug; 24(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 8617394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Three-dimensional color maps: a novel tool for assessing craniofacial changes.
    Jayaratne YS; Zwahlen RA; Lo J; Cheung LK
    Surg Innov; 2010 Sep; 17(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 20542953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The cant of the occlusal plane and distortion in the panoramic radiograph.
    Philipp RG; Hurst RV
    Angle Orthod; 1978 Oct; 48(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 281889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Roentgen stereophotogrammetry for analysis of cranial growth.
    Selvik G; Alberius P; Fahlman M
    Am J Orthod; 1986 Apr; 89(4):315-25. PubMed ID: 3457530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.