These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel filmholder and an x-ray beam manipulator. Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; van Aken J J Periodontol; 1991 Nov; 62(11):674-83. PubMed ID: 1753320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A method to reduce interproximal overlapping and improve reproducibility of bitewing radiographs for use in clinical trials. McDonald SP Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1983 Oct; 11(5):289-95. PubMed ID: 6578897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bitewing radiographs of children taken with and without a film-holding device. Harrison R; Richardson D Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 Aug; 18(3):97-9. PubMed ID: 2637884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro study into the influence of X-ray beam angulation on the detection of artificial caries defects on bitewing radiographs. van der Stelt PF; Ruttiman UE; Webber RL; Heemstra P Caries Res; 1989; 23(5):334-41. PubMed ID: 2766319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Errors generated with the use of rectangular collimation. Parks ET Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Apr; 71(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 2052340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Image resolution in dental and maxillofacial radiography with the conventional and "free focus" imaging concepts. Jensen TW; Goldberg AJ; Randall GJ Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1981 Jun; 51(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 6942366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison between bitewing radiographs taken with rectangular and circular collimators in UK military dental practices: a retrospective study. Parrott LA; Ng SY Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Feb; 40(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 21239573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates. Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of bitewing radiographs in detection of occlusal caries. King NM; Shaw L Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1979 Aug; 7(4):218-21. PubMed ID: 293240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigation into the relationship between deviations in X-ray angulation and images of proximal overlapping on bite-wing radiographs. McDonald SP Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1984 Jun; 12(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 6589108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of a decrease of interproximal overexposure of bitewing radiographs on the diagnosis of approximal caries. ten Bosch JJ; Noordmans J; Arnold LV; Borsboom PC Caries Res; 1989; 23(5):328-33. PubMed ID: 2766318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro effect of changing the horizontal angulation of X-ray beam on the detection of proximal enamel caries in bitewing radiographs. Shokri A; Kasraei S; Shokri E; Farhadian M; Hekmat B Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 30152632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of film holding, beam collimating and aiming devices in bitewing radiography. A suggested design for routine and research use. Pitts NB Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1983; 12(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 6584364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of proximal carious lesions: two-film versus four-film bitewing radiography. Kaffe I; Gordon M; Laufer B; Littner MM Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 May; 57(5):567-71. PubMed ID: 6587305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vivo evaluation in children of the HPL bitewing device. Pitts NB; Hamood SS; Longbottom C J Dent; 1989 Dec; 17(6):272-8. PubMed ID: 2691539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]