These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6578896)

  • 21. Radiovisiographic diagnosis of dental caries: initial comparison of basic mode videoprints with bitewing radiography.
    Russell M; Pitts NB
    Caries Res; 1993; 27(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 8448777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The optimum circular field size for dental radiography with intraoral films.
    van Straaten FJ; van Aken J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Sep; 54(3):347-59. PubMed ID: 6957831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A method for the geometric and densitometric standardization of intraoral radiographs.
    Duckworth JE; Judy PF; Goodson JM; Socransky SS
    J Periodontol; 1983 Jul; 54(7):435-40. PubMed ID: 6577180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A benchmark for comparison of dental radiography analysis algorithms.
    Wang CW; Huang CT; Lee JH; Li CH; Chang SW; Siao MJ; Lai TM; Ibragimov B; Vrtovec T; Ronneberger O; Fischer P; Cootes TF; Lindner C
    Med Image Anal; 2016 Jul; 31():63-76. PubMed ID: 26974042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Errors in diagnosis of approximal caries on bitewing radiographs.
    Murray JJ; Shaw L
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1975 Nov; 3(6):276-82. PubMed ID: 1059515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An in vitro study of the influence of X-ray beam angulation on the radiographic images of the amelocemental junction and simulated alveolar crest.
    Jenkins SM; Dummer PM; Addy M
    J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Nov; 19(6):629-37. PubMed ID: 1469498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Factors affecting the diagnostic quality of bitewing radiographs: a review.
    Chadwick BL; Dummer PH
    Br Dent J; 1998 Jan; 184(2):80-4; discussion 77. PubMed ID: 9489215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Alignment errors in bitewing radiographs using uncoupled positioning devices.
    Shrout MK; Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 8508940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Salvaging dark dental radiographs.
    Winstanley TD
    Dent Update; 1996; 23(6):246, 249. PubMed ID: 9084254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The frequency of bitewing radiographs.
    Shwartz M; Pliskin JS; Gröndahl H; Boffa J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Mar; 61(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 3458136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bitewing film quality: a clinical comparison of the loop vs. holder techniques.
    Kositbowornchai S; Phadannorg T; Permpoonsinsook M; Thinkhamrop B
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):321-5. PubMed ID: 15119720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of the reproducibility of two bitewing techniques by means of a microdensitometric recording method.
    Beyer-Olsen EM; Eggen S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Jan; 55(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 6572343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs.
    Kimmes NS; Saini TS; Carroll LR
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 16776410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of rectangular and cylindrical collimation for intraoral radiographs.
    Horton PS; Sippy FH; Nelson JF; Kohout FJ; Kienzle GC
    J Dent Educ; 1983 Dec; 47(12):771-3. PubMed ID: 6582105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The bitewing roentgenogram and its diagnostic importance.
    Kaffe I; Ben-Amar A
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim; 1978 Apr; 27(2):21-6, 17-21. PubMed ID: 283057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Utilize your dental X-ray set better.
    Sewerin P
    Int Dent J; 1987 Mar; 37(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 3473039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison between standardized periapical and bitewing radiographs in assessing alveolar bone loss.
    Albandar JM; Abbas DK; Waerhaug M; Gjermo P
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1985 Aug; 13(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 3862504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [A study of errors of radiography in 10000 intraoral periapical radiographs].
    Zhang ZL; Yang X; Zhao Y
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 1995 Sep; 4(3):142. PubMed ID: 15160073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reproducibility and overlapping of bitewing radiographs: comparison of Eggen-bite with Kwik-bite.
    Möystad A; Larheim TA
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1989 Apr; 17(2):65-7. PubMed ID: 2920541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.