These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6579576)
1. A long-term clinical comparison between a lathe-cut alloy and Dispersalloy. Pameijer CH; Benhameurlaine M Quintessence Int Dent Dig; 1983 May; 14(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 6579576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An evaluation of a lathe-cut high-copper amalgam alloy. Knibbs PJ; Plant CG; Shovelton DS; Jones PA J Oral Rehabil; 1987 Sep; 14(5):465-73. PubMed ID: 3312541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of admixed indium on the clinical success of amalgam restorations. Johnson GH; Bales DJ; Powell LV Oper Dent; 1992; 17(5):196-202. PubMed ID: 1289867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A three-year study of the clinical performance of a posterior composite and a lathe cut amalgam alloy. Robinson AA; Rowe AH; Maberley ML Br Dent J; 1988 Apr; 164(8):248-52. PubMed ID: 3164193 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A 30-month clinical evaluation of the influence of finishing and size of restoration on the margin performance of five amalgam alloys. Birtcil RF; Pelzner RB; Stark MM J Dent Res; 1981 Dec; 60(12):1949-56. PubMed ID: 7028822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A six-month clinical evaluation of polishing techniques on the marginal integrity of a high-copper alloy. Schmelitzer LD; Mayhew RB; Cowan RD; Voss JE J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1982; 61(5):17-9. PubMed ID: 6962253 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A clinical and laboratory study comparing three amalgam alloys of random particle-size, mixed phase with one of conventional regular lathe-cut particles. Morris ME; Braham RL; Schmutz JR; Kahl EA Acta Odontol Pediatr; 1981 Dec; 2(2):41-5. PubMed ID: 6949492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal failure of amalgam. Effect of alloy selection and bite forces. Dérand T Swed Dent J; 1983; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 6576493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of surface treatment on marginal integrity of amalgam restorations (in vitro study). Kamel FM Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1313-20. PubMed ID: 9497675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vacuum trituration of two amalgam alloys (Dispersalloy and Tytin): clinical and laboratory evaluation. Osborne JW; Wolff MS Oper Dent; 1984; 9(3):94-100. PubMed ID: 6591145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal adaptation and micro-porosity of class II restorations of a high copper amalgam and a palladium-free gallium-based alloy. Shaini FJ; Wahab FK; Ellakwa AE; Shortall AC; Fleming GJ; Marquis PM J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):924-33. PubMed ID: 17168935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early fracture resistance of amalgapin-retained complex amalgam restorations. Schulte GA; Hermesch CB; Vandewalle KS; Buikema DJ Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):108-12. PubMed ID: 9656920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A comparative evaluation of the technological characteristics of working with metal-containing filling materials in the clinic]. Iankevich OV Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1997; 76(6):16-8. PubMed ID: 9471804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]