These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6579853)

  • 1. [Histological and X-ray microanalytical study of subperiosteal implant. The comparison of surrounding tissue of the aluminum oxide coated and uncoated metal subperiosteal implant].
    Oguchi H
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1983 Mar; 21(1):18-37. PubMed ID: 6579853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative histologic evaluation of LTI carbon, carbon-coated aluminum oxide and uncoated aluminum oxide dental implants.
    Cook SD; Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ; Kent JN
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1983 May; 17(3):519-38. PubMed ID: 6863353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The retention mechanics of LTI carbon, carbon-coated aluminum oxide, and uncoated aluminum oxide dental implants.
    Cook SD; Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1983 Sep; 17(5):873-83. PubMed ID: 6352708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of implant elastic modulus on the stress distribution around LTI carbon and aluminum oxide dental implants.
    Cook SD; Klawitter JJ; Weinstein AM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1981 Nov; 15(6):879-87. PubMed ID: 7309769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Current status of the mandibular subperiosteal implant prosthesis.
    Mentag PJ
    Dent Clin North Am; 1980 Jul; 24(3):553-63. PubMed ID: 6995182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evolutionary design trends in the mandibular subperiosteal implant.
    Linkow LI
    J Oral Implantol; 1984; 11(3):402-38. PubMed ID: 6394772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of porous alumina ceramic dental implants.
    Klawitter JJ; Weinstein AM; Cooke FW; Peterson LJ; Pennel BM; McKinney RV
    J Oral Implantol; 1980; 9(1):64-82. PubMed ID: 6933400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A seven-year clinical evaluation of soft-tissue effects of hydroxylapatite-coated vs. uncoated subperiosteal implants.
    Fettig RH; Kay JF
    J Oral Implantol; 1994; 20(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 7932855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Analysis of the border zone between the human mandible and an aluminum oxide bio-ceramic implant by light microscopy, scanning microscopy and roentgen microanalysis].
    Vajdovich I; Kacsalova L; Suba Z; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 1986 Aug; 79(8):225-31. PubMed ID: 3463513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment of implant problems related to the mandibular full subperiosteal implant.
    Golec TS
    J Oral Implantol; 1981; 9(3):372-81. PubMed ID: 6942174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental study on the relationship between the initiation period of occlusal function and the tissue response around aluminum oxide implant.
    Takuma M; Takamori Y; Kurokawa F; Takashima F; Maruyama T
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1987 Dec; 27():101-9. PubMed ID: 3333389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parameters affecting the stress distribution around LTI carbon and aluminum oxide dental implants.
    Cook SD; Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 Nov; 16(6):875-85. PubMed ID: 7174713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ceramic-coated subperiosteal implants. II. Clinical and histologic evaluations.
    Benson D; Reisbick MH; Furstman LL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1974 Mar; 31(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 4204504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subperiosteal implant design based on peri-implant tissue behavior.
    James RA
    N Y J Dent; 1983 Dec; 53(8):407-14. PubMed ID: 6361637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Bio-ceramic single-crystal sapphire dental implant: material characteristics, animal experiments, mode of application and therapeutic armamentarium].
    Chen HD
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1987 Mar; 22(2):97-9, 127. PubMed ID: 3476285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Histologic evaluation of carbon-coated subperiosteal dental implants in dogs.
    Michieli S; Pizzoferrato A; Leake D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jan; 57(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 6582427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrastructural surface topography of the single crystal sapphire endosseous dental implant.
    McKinney RV; Steflik DE; Koth DL
    J Oral Implantol; 1984; 11(3):327-40. PubMed ID: 6596436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Corrosion detection in the connective tissue around the framework of subperiosteal implants].
    Kniha H; Schramel P; Nentwig GH
    Zahnarztl Prax; 1987 Apr; 38(4):131-5. PubMed ID: 3474842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ceramic-coated subperiosteal implants. I. A pilot study.
    Reisbick MH; Benson D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1974 Feb; 31(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 4203811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Restoration of deficient edentulous ridges by bone grafting and the use of subperiosteal metal implants.
    Boyne PJ
    Int J Oral Surg; 1974; 3(5):278-81. PubMed ID: 4214213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.