These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6581537)

  • 21. [I.F.P. or the index of facial proportions; a more precise parameter than a description of the face in the vertical dimension?].
    Opdebeeck H
    Orthod Fr; 1977; 48():309-19. PubMed ID: 276828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Significance of centric mandibular position in the cephalometric planning of corrective osteotomies].
    Spitzer WJ
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1985 Aug; 40(8):856-9. PubMed ID: 3868599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stereo-assisted landmark detection for the analysis of changes in 3-D facial shape.
    Naftel AJ; Trenouth MJ
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2004 Jun; 29(2):137-55. PubMed ID: 15370994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Soft tissue changes with combined mandibular setback and advancement genioplasty.
    Scheideman GB; Legan HL; Bell WH
    J Oral Surg; 1981 Jul; 39(7):505-9. PubMed ID: 6940958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Photocephalography for evaluation of tissue relations in mandibular surgery.
    Clark MS; Limongelli WA; Hayward H; Norris JE; Williams AC
    J Oral Surg; 1977 Apr; 35(4):319-20. PubMed ID: 264955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Two-dimensional changes in soft tissue profile following surgical mandibular advancement in Japanese retrognathic adults.
    Hamada T; Motohashi N; Kawamoto T; Ono T; Kato Y; Kuroda T
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(4):272-9. PubMed ID: 12390005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system.
    Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hard and soft tissue changes after correction of mandibular prognathism and facial asymmetry by mandibular setback surgery: three-dimensional analysis using computerized tomography.
    Jung YJ; Kim MJ; Baek SH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):763-771.e8. PubMed ID: 19272814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Soft tissue profile changes following mandibular advancement and setback surgery an average of 12 years postoperatively.
    Eggensperger NM; Lieger O; Thüer U; Iizuka T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Nov; 65(11):2301-10. PubMed ID: 17954329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An orthognathic simulation system integrating teeth, jaw and face data using 3D cephalometry.
    Noguchi N; Tsuji M; Shigematsu M; Goto M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 36(7):640-5. PubMed ID: 17368000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Anthropometric facial proportions as esthetic measurements in prosthodontics].
    Sedej R; Kosic H
    Zobozdrav Vestn; 1977; 32(5-6):145-56. PubMed ID: 382691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical indications for altering vertical dimension of occlusion. Objective vs subjective methods for determining vertical dimension of occlusion.
    Misch CE
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Apr; 31(4):280-2. PubMed ID: 11203937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparative study of the upper and lower vertical facial measurements of the Filipinos as it is used in the Willis method for determining the vertical dimension of occlusion.
    Tina-Olaivar EO; Olaivar OK
    J Philipp Dent Assoc; 1998; 50(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 10202517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multivariate comparison of craniofacial morphology in different types of facial clefts.
    Smahel Z; Hradiský D; Müllerová Z
    Acta Chir Plast; 1999; 41(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 10439520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Presentation of dynamic concepts in cephalometry].
    Slavicek R
    Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1982; 14(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 6961110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Changes in facial profile of young adults with normal occlusion: a longitudinal study.
    Tibana RH; Palagi LM; Carneiro MS; Almeida MA; Miguel JA
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 18575305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Soft tissue profile changes after vertical ramus osteotomy.
    Naoumova J; Söderfeldt B; Lindman R
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):359-65. PubMed ID: 18524760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The postural position of the mandible and the free-way space].
    Carlsson GE
    Sven Tandlak Tidskr; 1968 Apr; 61(4):243-56. PubMed ID: 5248955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of soft tissue and osseous bridge on facial configuration in adults with unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Smahel Z; Horák I
    Acta Chir Plast; 1993; 35(3-4):165-72. PubMed ID: 7515547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.