These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6581558)
41. Sensitometric and archival evaluation of Kodak RA films in dental automatic processing. Thunthy KH; Yeadon WR; Winberg R Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Apr; 77(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 8015810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Exposure reduction using Ektaspeed film. Howard ML; Stocks HS J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1982; 61(4):37-8. PubMed ID: 6958760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. [Comparative study of very high speed dental films]. Benz C Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Sep; 44(9):728-30. PubMed ID: 2637857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Effects of developer exhaustion on the sensitometric properties of four dental films. Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 10522196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Radiographic screening examination: frequency, equipment, and film in general dental practice in Denmark. Hintze H Scand J Dent Res; 1993 Feb; 101(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 8441898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Optimal processing of Ektaspeed dental film. Fjellström CA; Fredholm U; Julin P; Rehnmark S Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(4):137-43. PubMed ID: 3466376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Base and fog densities of fresh Ektaspeed Plus dental X-ray films. Sewerin IP Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Apr; 55(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 9176653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A comparison of the response of storage phosphor and film radiography to small variations in X-ray exposure. Hildebolt CF; Fletcher G; Yokoyama-Crothers N; Conover GL; Vannier MW Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9442600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Sensitometric evaluation of four dental X-ray films using five processing solutions. Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10522195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Sensitometric evaluation of a new F-speed dental radiographic film. Price C Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 11175270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Sensitometric and image quality performance of "rapid" intraoral film processing techniques. Czajka J; Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):49-58. PubMed ID: 8785621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Mail survey of dental radiographic techniques and radiation doses in Greece. Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC; Tsiklakis K Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Nov; 27(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 10895629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Evaluation of dental and dental DX roentgen films produced by the WZF Foton]. Mlosek K; Bończyk J; Winnicka-Szmielew B Pol Przegl Radiol; 1986; 50(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 3543882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Automatic processing: effects of temperature and time changes on sensitometric properties of ULTRA-SPEED and EKTASPEED films. Hashimoto K; Thunthy KH; Weinberg R Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jan; 71(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 1994314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]