These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6582114)

  • 41. Early fracture resistance of amalgapin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Schulte GA; Hermesch CB; Vandewalle KS; Buikema DJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):108-12. PubMed ID: 9656920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Amalgam.
    Chyz GT
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1994 Jul; 125(7):788-90, 792. PubMed ID: 8040526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Microleakage of a new cavity varnish with a high-copper spherical amalgam alloy.
    Fitchie JG; Reeves GW; Scarbrough AR; Hembree JH
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(4):136-40. PubMed ID: 2216906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Clinical evaluation of gallium alloy as a posterior restorative material.
    Navarro MF; Franco EB; Bastos PA; Teixeira LC; Carvalho RM
    Quintessence Int; 1996 May; 27(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 8941813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparative evaluation of marginal leakage of different types of silver amalgam alloys in vitro--a microfluoroscopic study.
    Mittal N; Srivastava AB; Singh U
    Fed Oper Dent; 1990 Dec; 1(2):12-6. PubMed ID: 2100665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Long-term monitoring of microleakage of different amalgams with different liners.
    Gallato A; Angnes G; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):571-6. PubMed ID: 15942619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
    Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Condensation pressure during amalgam placement in patients.
    Lussi A; Brunner M; Portmann P; Buergin W
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1995 Dec; 103(6):388-93. PubMed ID: 8747675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Marginal leakage in dental restorations].
    Garro Barrio J; Linaza Peña J; Triana Triana R; Barrio Fernández P
    Av Odontoestomatol; 1989 Dec; 5(10):714-25. PubMed ID: 2701051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Assessment of marginal leakage of class II amalgam-sealant restorations.
    Fuks AB; Grajover R; Eidelman E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1986; 53(5):343-5. PubMed ID: 3463579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Burnishing of amalgam restorations obtained from 3 different alloys, as a function of the time lapse after condensation of the material into the cavity].
    Wajngarten II
    Rev Fac Odontol Sao Paulo; 1977; 15(2):269-70. PubMed ID: 291092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Microleakage of conventional and high-copper amalgam restorations.
    Gottlieb EW; Retief DH; Bradley EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Mar; 53(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 3857332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Pneumatic versus hand condensation of amalgam: effect on microleakage.
    Chapman KW; Crim GA
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Jul; 23(7):495-8. PubMed ID: 1410251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A two-year randomized, controlled clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
    J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 11725662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Cervico-approximal "Sofort" polishing of amalgam fillings. Optimizing filling quality].
    Hannig M; Albers HK
    ZWR; 1989 Dec; 98(12):1044-6, 1048-50. PubMed ID: 2639547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Sensitivity answers sought in amalgam alloy microleakage study.
    Mahler DB; Nelson LW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1994 Mar; 125(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 8157840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Clinical evaluation of marginal fracture of amalgam restorations: one-year report.
    Osborne JW; Friedman SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Mar; 55(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 3457164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The amalgam restoration.
    Leinfelder KF
    Dent Clin North Am; 1983 Oct; 27(4):685-96. PubMed ID: 6360728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Clinical evaluation and marginal leakage of Amalgambond Plus: three-year results.
    Olmez A; Cula S; Ulusu T
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Oct; 28(10):651-6. PubMed ID: 9477885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.