These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6582137)

  • 1. Comparison of silver amalgam, glass ionomer cement & gutta percha as retrofilling materials, an in vivo & an in vitro study.
    Dalal MB; Gohil KS
    J Indian Dent Assoc; 1983 Apr; 55(4):153-8. PubMed ID: 6582137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tissue response to retrograde root fillings in the ferret canine: a comparison of a glass ionomer cement and gutta-percha with sealer.
    Callis PD; Santini A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Oct; 64(4):475-9. PubMed ID: 3477771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Glass ionomer as a new retroseal in comparison with other retrofilling techniques.
    Zakhary SY
    Egypt Dent J; 1990 Jan; 36(1):81-98. PubMed ID: 2135264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An electrochemical study of the sealing ability of different retrofilling materials.
    Alhadainy HA; Elsaed HY; Elbaghdady YM
    J Endod; 1993 Oct; 19(10):508-11. PubMed ID: 8120486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Ionomeric vitreous cement for retrograde root filling].
    Mailath G; Hartl E; Wernisch J; Lembacher J; Lill W; Matejka M
    Z Stomatol; 1989 Nov; 86(7):413-21. PubMed ID: 2638086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An in vitro evaluation of injectable thermoplasticized gutta-percha, glass ionomer, and amalgam when used as retrofilling materials.
    Olson AK; MacPherson MG; Hartwell GR; Weller RN; Kulild JC
    J Endod; 1990 Aug; 16(8):361-4. PubMed ID: 2081952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Are Ag-points, gutta percha and amalgam still useful as apical filling materials?].
    D'Haeseleire P; Thielens P; Bourgois F; Vanclooster R
    Acta Stomatol Belg; 1989 Dec; 86(4):243-50. PubMed ID: 2486638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro comparison of micro leakage in three glass ionomer cements used as retrograde filling materials.
    Rosales JI; Vallecillo M; Osorio R; Bravo M; Toledano M
    Int Dent J; 1996 Feb; 46(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 8744913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the sealing capabilities of Ketac-silver and extra high copper alloy amalgam when used as retrograde root canal filling.
    al-Ajam AD; McGregor AJ
    J Endod; 1993 Jul; 19(7):353-6. PubMed ID: 8245758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A study of the apical microleakage of a gallium alloy as a retrograde filling material.
    Hosoya N; Lautenschlager EP; Greener EH
    J Endod; 1995 Sep; 21(9):456-8. PubMed ID: 8537788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of glass ionomers as retrofilling materials.
    Barkhordar RA; Pelzner RB; Stark MM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Jun; 67(6):734-9. PubMed ID: 2500631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal adaptation of root-end filling materials: an in vitro study with teeth and replicas.
    Costa AT; Konrath F; Dedavid B; Weber JB; de Oliveira MG
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Mar; 10(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 19279975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrograde seal in ultrasonically prepared canals.
    Sutimuntanakul S; Worayoskowit W; Mangkornkarn C
    J Endod; 2000 Aug; 26(8):444-6. PubMed ID: 11199775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of fluorescent dye for detecting the relative sealing efficiency of various root canal sealers. Part IV: Effect of retrofilling procedure on the sealing efficiency of endomethasone.
    Taher M; Hassanein E; Sidky E
    Egypt Dent J; 1974 Oct; 20(4):1-12. PubMed ID: 4534867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro comparison of coronal microleakage between Resilon alone and gutta-percha with a glass-ionomer intraorifice barrier using a fluid filtration model.
    Jack RM; Goodell GG
    J Endod; 2008 Jun; 34(6):718-20. PubMed ID: 18498898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Are Ag-points, gutta percha and amalgam still applicable for apical sealing?].
    D'Haeseleire P; Thielens P; Bourgois F; Vanclooster R
    Acta Stomatol Belg; 1989 Dec; 86(4):243-50. PubMed ID: 2577746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative sealability study of different retrofilling materials.
    Ozata F; Erdilek N; Tezel H
    Int Endod J; 1993 Jul; 26(4):241-5. PubMed ID: 8225643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Glass ionomer cement used as a retrograde filling material after apicoectomy: a review].
    van Riessen AW; Reinders CJ; Brons R
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1990 Jul; 97(7):301-3. PubMed ID: 2215823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The apical seal of selected retrograde filling materials.
    Palaniak A
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1984 Dec; 50(12):903-5. PubMed ID: 6391632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.