These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6582420)
1. Effects of solution depletion on films developed in the Peri-Pro automatic processor. Thunthy KH; Weinberg R Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jan; 57(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 6582420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of films processed in automatic and manual processors. Thunthy KH; Weinberg R Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1980 Nov; 50(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 6935603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic processing: effects of temperature and time changes on the sensitometric properties of light-sensitive films. Thunthy KH; Hashimoto K; Weinberg R Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jul; 72(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 1891230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitometric and archival evaluation of Kodak RA films in dental automatic processing. Thunthy KH; Yeadon WR; Winberg R Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Apr; 77(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 8015810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Densitometric evaluation of four radiographic processing solutions. Akdeniz BG; Lomçali G Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 9656875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image quality comparisons of X-Omat RP, L and B films. Van Dis ML; Beck FM Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):132-4. PubMed ID: 1807996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films. Farman TT; Farman AG Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Base and fog densities of fresh Ektaspeed Plus dental X-ray films. Sewerin IP Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Apr; 55(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 9176653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of varying processing solution temperature on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of dental film. Matthee MJ; Becker PJ; Seeliger JE J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1990 Dec; 45(12):525-8. PubMed ID: 2098942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitometric comparison of speed group E and F dental radiographic films. Geist JR; Brand JW Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 11420626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Densitometric evaluation of seven dental film processing solutions. Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1990 Feb; 45(2):31-3. PubMed ID: 2385845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automatic processing: effects of temperature and time changes on sensitometric properties of ULTRA-SPEED and EKTASPEED films. Hashimoto K; Thunthy KH; Weinberg R Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jan; 71(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 1994314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Processor quality assurance using digital imaging. Goren AD; Dunn SM; Van der Stelt PF N Y State Dent J; 1997 Apr; 63(4):42-7. PubMed ID: 9167431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]