These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6582420)

  • 21. Densitometric evaluation of intra-oral radiographic film-processing solution combinations.
    Swart TJ; Seeliger JE
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1989 Jul; 44(7):281-3. PubMed ID: 2637510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Development of the automatic dental X-ray film processor].
    Bai J; Chen H
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 1999 Jul; 23(4):214-6. PubMed ID: 12583065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sensitometric evaluation of four dental X-ray films using five processing solutions.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10522195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Effect of solution depletion on image quality in the dental automatic processor (P-10)].
    Naitoh M; Yasui S; Ushida M; Ishigaki S; Nishimura A; Shiojima M; Kikuchi A; Tamada A; Matsuo A
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1986 Jun; 24(2):298-307. PubMed ID: 3466551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Densitometric evaluation of three x-ray films with five different developing solutions.
    Kaffe I; Littner MM; Tamse A; Kuspet ME
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Feb; 57(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 6583629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. E-speed dental films processed with rapid chemistry: a comparison with D-speed film.
    Kaffe I; Gratt BM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Sep; 64(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 3477753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bacterial adherence and contamination during radiographic processing.
    Bachman CE; White JM; Goodis HE; Rosenquist JW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Nov; 70(5):669-73. PubMed ID: 2122350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing the quality of radiographic processing in general dental practice.
    Thornley PH; Stewardson DA; Rout PG; Burke FJ
    Br Dent J; 2006 May; 200(9):515-9; discussion 503. PubMed ID: 16703095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sensitometric comparisons of Insight and Ektaspeed Plus films: effects of chemical developer depletion.
    Casanova MS; Haiter-Neto F; Bóscolo FN; de Almeida SM
    Braz Dent J; 2006; 17(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 16924344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of automated nonroller processing on the sensitometric characteristics of 3 intraoral film types.
    Geist JR; Brand JW; Pink FE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Jul; 96(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 12847452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The accuracy of an x-ray film quality-assurance step-wedge test.
    Bloxom RM; Manson-Hing LR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Oct; 62(4):449-58. PubMed ID: 3464919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of developer temperature changes on the sensitometric properties of direct exposure and screen-film imaging systems.
    Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou LS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 Feb; 18(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 2599232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed films using manual and automatic processing solutions.
    Fletcher JC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Jan; 63(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 3468472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of storage conditions on film characteristics of Ektaspeed plus and Ultra-speed films.
    Platin E; Nesbit SP; Ludlow JB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Feb; 130(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 10036844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of developer exhaustion on the sensitometric properties of four dental films.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 10522196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Is E-speed dental film more sensitive to storage than D-speed dental film?
    Petersson A; Lindh C; Nilsson M
    Swed Dent J; 1987; 11(4):159-62. PubMed ID: 3480614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Comparative study of Agfa-Gavaert, Kodak Ultra-Speed and Kodak Ektaspeed dental radiographic films, processed in Sillib solution].
    Capelozza AL; Alvares LC
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1990; 4(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 2135356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of processor temperature on film dosimetry.
    Srivastava SP; Das IJ
    Med Dosim; 2012; 37(2):138-9. PubMed ID: 21925862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Characteristics of Kodak Insight, an F-speed intraoral film.
    Ludlow JB; Platin E; Mol A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):120-9. PubMed ID: 11174582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optimal processing of Ektaspeed dental film.
    Fjellström CA; Fredholm U; Julin P; Rehnmark S
    Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(4):137-43. PubMed ID: 3466376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.