These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6582427)

  • 1. Histologic evaluation of carbon-coated subperiosteal dental implants in dogs.
    Michieli S; Pizzoferrato A; Leake D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jan; 57(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 6582427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reaction of surrounding gingiva to permucosal implants of dense hydroxyapatite in dogs.
    Kurashina K; de Lange GL; de Putter C; de Groot K
    Biomaterials; 1984 Jul; 5(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 6091800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Histologic evaluation of vitreous carbon endosteal implants in occlusion in dogs.
    Grenoble DE; Melrose RJ; Markle DH
    Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs; 1975; 3(2):245-58. PubMed ID: 1182253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Histological and X-ray microanalytical study of subperiosteal implant. The comparison of surrounding tissue of the aluminum oxide coated and uncoated metal subperiosteal implant].
    Oguchi H
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1983 Mar; 21(1):18-37. PubMed ID: 6579853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Histologic evaluation of vitreous carbon endosteal implants in dogs.
    Markle DH; Grenoble DE; Melrose RJ
    Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs; 1975; 3(1):97-114. PubMed ID: 1139026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term implant denture histology and comparison with previous reports.
    Bodine RL; Melrose RJ; Grenoble DE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1976 Jun; 35(6):665-73. PubMed ID: 784956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of change of surface microstructure of carbon oral implants on gingival structures.
    Hottel TL; Gibbons DF
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1982 Oct; 40(10):647-50. PubMed ID: 6956687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tissue considerations for subperiosteal implants.
    Benson D
    Implantologist; 1978 Aug; 1(3):59-69. PubMed ID: 290558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of transmucosal designs of three one-piece implant systems on early tissue responses: a histometric study in beagle dogs.
    Kim S; Oh KC; Han DH; Heo SJ; Ryu IC; Kwon JH; Han CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):309-14. PubMed ID: 20369089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of a new implant abutment design on peri-implant soft tissues.
    Chien HH; Schroering RL; Prasad HS; Tatakis DN
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Oct; 40(5):581-8. PubMed ID: 23339331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone of immediate or delayed occlusal-loaded non-splinted implants in the posterior mandible--an experimental study in monkeys.
    Stokholm R; Isidor F; Nyengaard JR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1311-1318. PubMed ID: 24118392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of Implant transmucosal design on early peri-implant tissue responses in beagle dogs.
    Huh JB; Rheu GB; Kim YS; Jeong CM; Lee JY; Shin SW
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Aug; 25(8):962-8. PubMed ID: 23647221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of functional use of endosseous dental implants on the tissue-implant interface. I. Histological aspects.
    Brunski JB; Moccia AF; Pollack SR; Korostoff E; Trachtenberg DI
    J Dent Res; 1979 Oct; 58(10):1953-69. PubMed ID: 291620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biologic width around titanium implants. A histometric analysis of the implanto-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible.
    Cochran DL; Hermann JS; Schenk RK; Higginbottom FL; Buser D
    J Periodontol; 1997 Feb; 68(2):186-98. PubMed ID: 9058338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bone-implant interface structures after nontapping and tapping insertion of screw-type titanium alloy endosseous implants.
    Satomi K; Akagawa Y; Nikai H; Tsuru H
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Mar; 59(3):339-42. PubMed ID: 3162274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Titanium endosteal dental implants in the mandibles of beagle dogs: a 2 year study.
    Gourley IM; Richards LW; Cordy DR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1976 Nov; 36(5):550-66. PubMed ID: 1068291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design and materials evaluation for a dental implant system: carbon coated tooth replicas.
    Michieli S; Leake DL; Pizzoferrato A; Haubold A; Bokros J
    Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs; 1979; 7(2):313-20. PubMed ID: 380669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Alumina and zirconia coated vitallium oral endosteal implants in beagles.
    Cranin AN; Schnitman PA; Rabkin SM; Onesto EJ
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1975 Jul; 9(4):257-62. PubMed ID: 1176508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tissue considerations for mandibular subperiosteal implants.
    Benson D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1977 Jan; 37(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 264322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Corrosion detection in the connective tissue around the framework of subperiosteal implants].
    Kniha H; Schramel P; Nentwig GH
    Zahnarztl Prax; 1987 Apr; 38(4):131-5. PubMed ID: 3474842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.