These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6582427)

  • 21. Periodontal implications of the surface characteristics of dental implants in the area of the gingival junction.
    Skerman JH; ElGeneidy AK; Stallard RE
    J Periodontol; 1974 Oct; 45(10):731-8. PubMed ID: 4612131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Wound healing of endosteal vitreous carbon implants in dogs.
    Al-Salman AH; Sayegh FS; Chappell RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Jan; 41(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 281528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Histologic evaluation of immediate versus delayed placement of implants after tooth extraction.
    Schultes G; Gaggl A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jul; 92(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11458241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A histological assessment of the initial healing response adjacent to porous-surfaced, titanium alloy dental implants in dogs.
    Deporter DA; Watson PA; Pilliar RM; Melcher AH; Winslow J; Howley TP; Hansel P; Maniatopoulos C; Rodriguez A; Abdulla D
    J Dent Res; 1986 Aug; 65(8):1064-70. PubMed ID: 3525627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Histologic evaluation of a retrieved human HA-coated subperiosteal implant: report of a case.
    Benjamin LS; Block MS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1989; 4(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 2557282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hydroxyapatite-coated subperiosteal dental implants: design rationale and clinical experience.
    Kay JF; Golec TS; Riley RL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Sep; 58(3):339-43. PubMed ID: 3040971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Soft tissue healing at titanium implants coated with type I collagen. An experimental study in dogs.
    Welander M; Abrahamsson I; Linder E; Liljenberg B; Berglundh T
    J Clin Periodontol; 2007 May; 34(5):452-8. PubMed ID: 17355363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Soft tissue dimensions in flapless immediate implants with and without immediate loading: an experimental study in the beagle dog.
    Blanco J; Carral C; Liñares A; Pérez J; Muñoz F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 21492235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Histologic and histomorphometric comparison of immediately placed hydroxyapatite-coated and titanium plasma-sprayed implants: a pilot study in dogs.
    Karabuda C; Sandalli P; Yalcin S; Steflik DE; Parr GR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):510-5. PubMed ID: 10453665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Methods of animal experimental histological studies on needle implantation].
    Heusert H; Schmidt HF; Bernhardt H; Hindes WZ
    Dtsch Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl Gesamte; 1973 May; 60(5):305-13. PubMed ID: 4123913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The ramus-endosseous, anterior-subperiosteal implant technique for the severely atrophic mandible.
    Byland JH
    J Oral Implantol; 1986; 12(2):258-70. PubMed ID: 3519996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantitative histologic evaluation of LTI carbon, carbon-coated aluminum oxide and uncoated aluminum oxide dental implants.
    Cook SD; Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ; Kent JN
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1983 May; 17(3):519-38. PubMed ID: 6863353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Coated versus non-Proplast-coated endosseous blade-vent dental implants.
    Svare CW; LaVelle WE; DeLong PE; Kent J; Weber D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1975 Jul; 40(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 1057137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Load-transfer characteristics of mandibular subperiosteal implants.
    Jones SD; Caputo AA; Benson D; Borggrebe E
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Aug; 42(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 379321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Flap vs. "flapless" surgical approach at immediate implants: a histomorphometric study in dogs.
    Caneva M; Botticelli D; Salata LA; Souza SL; Bressan E; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Dec; 21(12):1314-9. PubMed ID: 20637034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Coating of subperiosteal implants with glass-ceramics].
    Grasser H; Barth HH
    Zahnarztl Prax; 1987 Feb; 38(2):42-5. PubMed ID: 3296543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Two cases of incompatibility to carbon-coated subperiosteal implants.
    Hess JA; Molinari JA; Mentag PJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Nov; 54(5):499-505. PubMed ID: 6960303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Casting defects in subperiosteal implants: an x-ray investigation.
    Hargraves J; Hobkirk JA
    J Dent; 1982 Mar; 10(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 7045176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Polydopamine deposition with anodic oxidation for better connective tissue attachment to transmucosal implants.
    Teng F; Chen H; Xu Y; Liu Y; Ou G
    J Periodontal Res; 2018 Apr; 53(2):222-231. PubMed ID: 29063626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A clinical and histologic assessment of subperiosteal implants.
    Mack AO
    J Prosthet Dent; 1973 Oct; 30(4 Pt 2):516-20. PubMed ID: 4200658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.