BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6583197)

  • 1. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to imipenem.
    Tally FP; Jacobus NV
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1983 Dec; 12 Suppl D():47-51. PubMed ID: 6583197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro activity of imipenem against anaerobic bacteria.
    Wexler HM; Finegold SM
    Rev Infect Dis; 1985; 7 Suppl 3():S417-25. PubMed ID: 3901206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group species and other anaerobic bacteria to meropenem, imipenem, piperacillin, cefoxitin, ampicillin/sulbactam, clindamycin and metronidazole.
    Goldstein EJ; Citron DM; Cherubin CE; Hillier SL
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1993 Mar; 31(3):363-72. PubMed ID: 8486570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to Sch 34343 and other antibiotics.
    Glupczynski Y; Gordts B; van der Linden MP; Labbé M; Yourassowsky E; Butzler JP
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1985 Jun; 15 Suppl C():193-8. PubMed ID: 4030548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variations in susceptibility to latamoxef(moxalactam) and cefoxitin within the Bacteroides fragilis group.
    Eley A; Greenwood D
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1984 Mar; 13(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 6725175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to Sch 34343 and other beta-lactam antibiotics.
    Jacobus NV; Tally FP; Gorbach SL
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1985 Jun; 15 Suppl C():189-91. PubMed ID: 4030547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High incidence of cefoxitin and clindamycin resistance among anaerobes in Taiwan.
    Teng LJ; Hsueh PR; Tsai JC; Liaw SJ; Ho SW; Luh KT
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2002 Sep; 46(9):2908-13. PubMed ID: 12183246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro activity of imipenem against gram-positive anaerobic bacteria.
    Dubreuil L; Devos J; Romond C
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Res; 1987; 7(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 3473047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative in vitro activities of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and imipenem against anaerobic bacteria isolated from community hospitals.
    Goldstein EJ; Citron DM
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1986 Jan; 29(1):158-60. PubMed ID: 3460519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Antibacterial activity of meropenem and selected comparative agents against anaerobic bacteria at seven North American centers.
    Sheikh W; Pitkin DH; Nadler H
    Clin Infect Dis; 1993 Jun; 16 Suppl 4():S361-6. PubMed ID: 8324148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In-vitro activity of Sch 34343 against anaerobic bacteria.
    Wexler H; Carter WT; Finegold SM
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1985 Jun; 15 Suppl C():173-6. PubMed ID: 3861606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro activity of N-formimidoyl thienamycin, moxalactam, and other new beta-lactam agents against Bacteroides fragilis: contribution of beta-lactamase to resistance.
    Brown JE; Del Bene VE; Collins CD
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1981 Feb; 19(2):248-52. PubMed ID: 6214986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Antibacterial effect of imipenem in vitro against important aerobic and anaerobic strains isolated from clinical specimens.
    Klietmann W; Focht J; Nösner K
    Chemioterapia; 1987 Aug; 6(4):243-50. PubMed ID: 3477332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Anaerobic Bacterial Clinical Isolates From 2014 to 2016, Including Recently Named or Renamed Species.
    Byun JH; Kim M; Lee Y; Lee K; Chong Y
    Ann Lab Med; 2019 Mar; 39(2):190-199. PubMed ID: 30430782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro activity of L-627 against anaerobic bacteria.
    Nord CE; Lindmark A; Persson I
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992 Aug; 11(8):757-60. PubMed ID: 1425740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparative in vitro activity of ampicillin, cefoperazone and their combinations with sulbactam, as well as that of other antibiotics against anaerobic organisms].
    Rezvan SP; Sidorenko SV; Budanov SV
    Antibiot Khimioter; 1995 Apr; 40(4):25-9. PubMed ID: 7654095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beta-lactamases of type culture strains of the Bacteroides fragilis group and of strains that hydrolyse cefoxitin, latamoxef and imipenem.
    Eley A; Greenwood D
    J Med Microbiol; 1986 Feb; 21(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 3485198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Epidemiology and susceptibility of resistant Bacteroides fragilis group organisms to new beta-lactam antibiotics.
    Heseltine PN; Appleman MD; Leedom JM
    Rev Infect Dis; 1984; 6 Suppl 1():S254-9. PubMed ID: 6585882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to meropenem.
    Nord CE; Lindmark A; Persson I
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1989 Sep; 24 Suppl A():113-7. PubMed ID: 2553656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to antimicrobial agents.
    Collignon PJ; Munro R; Morris G
    Pathology; 1988 Jan; 20(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 3374973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.