These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6583629)

  • 21. Base and fog densities of fresh Ektaspeed Plus dental X-ray films.
    Sewerin IP
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Apr; 55(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 9176653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of developer exhaustion on Kodak EKTASPEED Plus, Ektaspeed, and Ultra-speed dental films.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 7614150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of six intra-oral X-ray films.
    Conover GL; Hildebolt CF; Anthony D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Aug; 24(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 8617390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Characteristics of Kodak Insight, an F-speed intraoral film.
    Ludlow JB; Platin E; Mol A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):120-9. PubMed ID: 11174582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of time and exposure to air on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of three rapid dental film processing solutions.
    Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE; Prinsloo NJ; Swart NG
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1993 Jan; 48(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 9511608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of a new dental X-ray film, Agfa Gevaert Dentus M4, with Kodak Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed dental X-ray films.
    Svenson B; Lindvall AM; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 8508944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contamination of dental radiographic solutions.
    Tamburus JR; Pardini LC; Watanabe PC
    Braz Dent J; 1995; 6(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 8688649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sensitometric evaluation of a new F-speed dental radiographic film.
    Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 11175270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of automated nonroller processing on the sensitometric characteristics of 3 intraoral film types.
    Geist JR; Brand JW; Pink FE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Jul; 96(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 12847452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of solution depletion on films developed in the Peri-Pro automatic processor.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jan; 57(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 6582420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A sensitometric comparison of four dental X-ray films and their diagnostic accuracy.
    Svenson B; Welander U; Shi XQ; Stamatakis H; Tronje G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul; 26(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 9442614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of developer exhaustion on the sensitometric properties of four dental films.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 10522196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Factors involved in the high radiographic sensitivity of E-speed films.
    Domon M; Yoshino N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Jan; 69(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 2296442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Objective and subjective assessments of Kodak Ektaspeed plus new dental X-ray film: a comparison with other conventional X-ray films.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8689744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of developer exhaustion on DFL Contrast FV-58 and Kodak Insight dental films.
    de Carvalho FP; da Silveira MM; Frazão MA; de Santana ST; dos Anjos Pontual ML
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Sep; 40(6):358-61. PubMed ID: 21831975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of scattered radiation and tube potential on radiographic contrast: comparison of two different dental X-ray films.
    Helmrot E; Carlsson GA; Eckerdal O; Sandborg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):135-46. PubMed ID: 1807997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Differences in aluminum equivalent values of endodontic sealers: conventional versus digital radiography.
    Baksi BG; Sen BH; Eyuboglu TF
    J Endod; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1101-4. PubMed ID: 18718374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Densitometric evaluation of Soludent and GBX developers.
    Patel JR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Jan; 59(1):107-9. PubMed ID: 3856199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Variations in film exposure, effective kVp, and HVL among thirty-five dental x-ray units.
    Preece JW; Jensen CW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Dec; 56(6):655-61. PubMed ID: 6581465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A densitometric evaluation of two radiographic duplicating films under differing conditions of exposure and processing.
    Price C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1980 Aug; 50(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 6930620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.