These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
62. Newer Class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration. Ferdianakis K; White GE J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 10686867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. The effect of resin composite pins on the retention of class IV restorations. Muhlbauer JA; Dunn WJ; Roberts HW; Murchison DF Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):284-8. PubMed ID: 12022461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. A panoramic overview of Class II posterior composite resin placement techniques. Trushkowsky RD Dent Today; 1995 Sep; 14(9):60, 62-5. PubMed ID: 9540593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. A simplified aesthetic concept: historical review and current clinical application. Terry DA; Leinfelder KF Dent Today; 2008 Sep; 27(9):66, 68, 70 passim; quiz 73. PubMed ID: 18807953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Posterior composites: injecting composite resins and using Mylar matrix bands will eliminate gingival margin failures and increase tight contacts. Belvedere PC Northwest Dent; 1994; 73(2):19-22. PubMed ID: 7937039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. Microleakage and damage to adjacent teeth when finishing Class II adhesive preparations using either a sonic device or bur. Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; van Berghem E; Eijsvogels E; Bronkhorst E Am J Dent; 2002 Oct; 15(5):317-20. PubMed ID: 12537342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Impression matrix technique for cusp replacement using direct composite resin. Denehy G; Cobb D J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(4):227-33; discussion 234. PubMed ID: 15672615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Class 5 composite resin restorations: margin configurations and the distance from the CEJ. Hall LH; Cochran MA; Swartz ML Oper Dent; 1993; 18(6):246-50. PubMed ID: 8152997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. A pin amalgam or composite core foundation technique for teeth with minimal coronal structure. Mamoun JS; Cervini E J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):599-602. PubMed ID: 15211306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Preoperative occlusal matrix aids the development of occlusal contour of posterior occlusal resin composite restorations--clinical rationale and technique. Geddes A; Craig J; Chadwick RG Br Dent J; 2009 Mar; 206(6):315-7. PubMed ID: 19329960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Direct resin restoration of interproximal caries using a predictable matrix technique. Fligor J Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008; 20(10):607-9. PubMed ID: 19274957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. A method for marginating a class V composite resin. Kanter J Quintessence Int Dent Dig; 1978 Sep; 9(9):21-3. PubMed ID: 296455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. A modified matrix technique for the application of restorative materials on the facial surfaces of teeth. Doukoudakis S; Doukoudakis A Oper Dent; 1994; 19(6):202-4. PubMed ID: 9028237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Anterior direct composite: easy as 1-2-3. Agarwal T Dent Today; 2005 Oct; 24(10):138, 140-1. PubMed ID: 16277076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. Practical procedures No 11. Simplified finishing procedures for posterior direct resin restorations. Freedman G Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 17(2):3 p preceding 137. PubMed ID: 15918308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]