These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Fracture resistance of extensive amalgam restorations retained by pins, amalgapins and amalgam bonding agents. Imbery TA; Coudron J; Moon PC Oper Dent; 2008; 33(6):666-74. PubMed ID: 19051860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical resistance of extensive amalgam "restorations" anchored with the aid of threaded pins and amalgapins. Zangirolami NT; Steagall L; dos Santos Júnior J Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1989; 3(1):289-93. PubMed ID: 2638492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A review of the amalgapin technique for complex amalgam restorations. Eberting JJ Gen Dent; 2000; 48(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 11199563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of resistance features for complex amalgam restorations. Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Kaiser DA; Rux HW; Dutton FB Am J Dent; 1991 Dec; 4(6):268-72. PubMed ID: 1814348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of cross-sectional area on transverse strength of Amalgapin-retained restorations. Certosimo AJ; House RC; Anderson MH Oper Dent; 1991; 16(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 1803331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retention and resistance features for complex amalgam restorations. Robbins JW; Burgess JO; Summitt JB J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 Apr; 118(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 2651502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing the resistance of dentin bonding agents and pins in amalgam restorations. Imbery TA; Burgess JO; Batzer RC J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Jun; 126(6):753-9. PubMed ID: 7797731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanical versus chemical retention for restoring complex restorations: what is the evidence? Vaught RL J Dent Educ; 2007 Oct; 71(10):1356-62. PubMed ID: 17923714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pins and their relation to cavity resistance form for amalgam. Buikema DJ; Mayhew RB; Voss JE; Bales DJ Quintessence Int; 1985 Mar; 16(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 3857664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Conservative restorations in the posterior quadrant using amalgam: indications, instrumentation and operative method. I]. Palattella G; Mangani F; Palattella P; Carnesecchi R Dent Cadmos; 1986 Feb; 54(3):59-68. PubMed ID: 3460844 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Optimized pin geometry for improved retention of parapulpal pins in amalgam]. Neumeyer S; Gernet W; Bötsch H Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Aug; 46(8):550-2. PubMed ID: 1817928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retention of self-threading pins. Dilts WE; Duncanson MG; Collard EW; Parmley LE J Can Dent Assoc; 1981 Feb; 47(2):119-20. PubMed ID: 7011502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The number and location of threaded pins for optimal resistance and retention in premolar amalgam restorations. Harrington WG; Moon PC; Crockett WD Va Dent J; 1982 Oct; 59(5):24-31. PubMed ID: 6964007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Pins and intracoronal retentive features for multisurface amalgam restorations. Munk MB; Brokaw WC Gen Dent; 1989; 37(4):320-3. PubMed ID: 2638287 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]