These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6584032)

  • 1. Diagnosis and treatment planning of skeletal asymmetry with the submental-vertical radiograph.
    Forsberg CT; Burstone CJ; Hanley KJ
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Mar; 85(3):224-37. PubMed ID: 6584032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of craniofacial morphology in patients with and without facial asymmetry--a three-dimensional analysis with computed tomography.
    Kwon TG; Park HS; Ryoo HM; Lee SH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15925488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Maxillo-mandibular dysharmony: new perspectives in radiographic semeiology].
    Laude M; Thilloy G; Delachapelle C; Lainey P; Graindorge E
    Rev Stomatoodontol Nord Fr; 1975; 30(118):163-74. PubMed ID: 1075622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of mandibular asymmetry in angle malocclusion samples by posterioanterior cephalometric radiography: A preliminary study.
    Alkis HT; Bilge OM
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Jun; 22(6):771-776. PubMed ID: 31187760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cephalometric norms for craniofacial asymmetry using submental-vertical radiographs.
    Arnold TG; Anderson GC; Liljemark WF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Sep; 106(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 8074089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
    Baek C; Paeng JY; Lee JS; Hong J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):1161-9. PubMed ID: 21763045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mandibular asymmetry: a proposal of radiographic analysis with public domain software.
    Lemos AD; Katz CR; Heimer MV; Rosenblatt A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):52-8. PubMed ID: 25162566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A computerized photographic assessment of the relationship between skeletal discrepancy and mandibular outline asymmetry.
    Good S; Edler R; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 16431897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of asymmetry in a normal occlusion sample and asymmetric patients with three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography: a study for a transverse reference plane.
    Park JU; Kook YA; Kim Y
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):860-7. PubMed ID: 22356706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Janson GR; Metaxas A; Woodside DG; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 11298314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A case report comparing 3-D evaluation in the diagnosis and treatment planning of hemimandibular hyperplasia with conventional radiography.
    Tuncer BB; Ataç MS; Yüksel S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 37(6):312-9. PubMed ID: 19289289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Panoramic analysis in diagnosis of cranio-maxillofacial asymmetries].
    Anistoroaei D
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2009; 113(1):250-6. PubMed ID: 21495328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unilateral craniofacial microsomia. Part I. Mandibular analysis.
    Grayson BH; Boral S; Eisig S; Kolber A; McCarthy JG
    Am J Orthod; 1983 Sep; 84(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 6577795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in adolescents with unilateral and bilateral posterior crossbite using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
    Halicioglu K; Celikoglu M; Yavuz I; Sekerci AE; Buyuk SK
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 24968641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity of panoramic radiographs for measuring mandibular asymmetry.
    Kambylafkas P; Murdock E; Gilda E; Tallents RH; Kyrkanides S
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):388-93. PubMed ID: 16637716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry.
    Katsumata A; Fujishita M; Maeda M; Ariji Y; Ariji E; Langlais RP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Feb; 99(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 15660095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements obtained from digital photographs of analogue headfilms.
    Grybauskas S; Balciuniene I; Vetra J
    Stomatologija; 2007; 9(4):114-20. PubMed ID: 18303276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnosis of dental and mandibular asymmetries in children according to Levandoski Panoramic Analysis.
    Biagi R; Craparo A; Trovato F; Butti AC; Salvato A
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2012 Dec; 13(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 23270287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of facial asymmetry on 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional cephalometric measurements.
    Gateno J; Xia JJ; Teichgraeber JF
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 69(3):655-62. PubMed ID: 21353927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single-splint technique for correction of severe facial asymmetry: correlation between intraoperative maxillomandibular complex roll and restoration of mouth symmetry.
    Bergeron L; Yu CC; Chen YR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Nov; 122(5):1535-1541. PubMed ID: 18971738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.