272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6584050)
1. Imaging characteristics of new screen/film systems for cephalometric radiography.
Fatouros PP; Gibbs SJ; Skubic SE; Rao GU
Angle Orthod; 1984 Jan; 54(1):36-54. PubMed ID: 6584050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Clinical application of modified dental intensifying screen (author's transl)].
Luo WF
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Ke Za Zhi; 1982; 17(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 6955156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Image contrast in various cassette-screen-film combinations].
Barth HH; Grasser H
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1985 Dec; 40(12):1230-4. PubMed ID: 3869536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A dual sensitivity screen system for TMJ image enhancement in cephalometric radiography: sensitometric evaluation.
Wakoh M; Farman AG; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K; Scarfe WC; Braun S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Aug; 24(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 8617394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clinical evaluation of intensifying screens and films for intraoral radiography].
Okano T; Yoda E
Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Mar; 50(1):155. PubMed ID: 6577111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative assessment of a new dental imaging system.
Walker A; Horner K; Czajka J; Shearer AC; Wilson NH
Br J Radiol; 1991 Jun; 64(762):529-36. PubMed ID: 2070184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of x-ray film by dental professionals in the United States.
Platin E
Tex Dent J; 2002 May; 119(5):396-400, 402. PubMed ID: 12046402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Extraoral x-ray film continues to evolve, improve.
Rostron T
Dent Assist; 2003; 72(5):22-5. PubMed ID: 14596151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Reduction of radiation dosage by the use of newer reinforced rare earth films].
Hofmann T
Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1987; 19(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 3474210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of rare earth intensifying screens in cephalometric radiography.
Stathopoulos V; Poulton DR
Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 2180348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative evaluation of the sensitometric properties of screen-film systems and conventional dental receptors for intraoral radiography.
Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou L
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 2594331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Absorbed radiation dose during lateral cephalometric radiography: comparison of screen-film systems and field-size combinations.
Tsiklakis K; Donta-Bakoyanni C; Tassopoulou M; Kamenopoulou V
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 11314319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Direct digital radiography in the dental office.
Wenzel A; Gröndahl HG
Int Dent J; 1995 Feb; 45(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 7607741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of image quality on the identification of cephalometric landmarks.
McWilliam JS; Welander U
Angle Orthod; 1978 Jan; 48(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 272131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of screen/film combinations for cephalometric radiography.
McNicol A; Stirrups DR
Br J Orthod; 1985 Jul; 12(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 3860251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of kilovoltage on the relative speed of rare-earth screens.
Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 3460902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Clinical experiences with dental xeroradiography (Xerox 110 system)].
Hashida T; Tokuoka O; Iwamoto M; Takahashi A; Kato K; Kanke M
Osaka Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1985 Dec; 30(2):357-64. PubMed ID: 3869235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A rare earth screen-film system for dental panoramic radiography.
Keur JJ
Aust Dent J; 1983 Apr; 28(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 6577821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reciprocity law failure for a film-screen combination: very long exposure times.
Hale J; Thomas JW
Health Phys; 1983 Sep; 45(3):780-2. PubMed ID: 6885487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiation protection guidelines for the practicing orthodontist.
Mupparapu M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):168-72; discussion 172. PubMed ID: 16102399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
