These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6584342)

  • 1. Restoration of primary teeth with amalgam.
    Mathewson RJ
    Dent Clin North Am; 1984 Jan; 28(1):137-43. PubMed ID: 6584342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The new generation amalgam alloys. Clinical considerations.
    Jordan RE; Suzuki M; Boksman L
    Dent Clin North Am; 1985 Apr; 29(2):341-58. PubMed ID: 3858165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors affecting the marginal leakage of amalgam.
    Mahler DB; Nelson LW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1984 Jan; 108(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 6582114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Criteria for choice of an alloy for dental amalgams].
    De Valkeneer I; Bercy P
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1990 Jun; 44(170):219-36. PubMed ID: 2088017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gallium alloy versus high copper amalgam: a comparative evaluation of corrosion resistance and microleakage in the primary teeth.
    Munshi AK; Hegde AM; Bhaskar S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 11314418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The amalgam restoration.
    Leinfelder KF
    Dent Clin North Am; 1983 Oct; 27(4):685-96. PubMed ID: 6360728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fluoride-releasing resin bonding of amalgam restorations in primary teeth: in vitro secondary caries effect.
    Hicks J; Milano M; Seybold S; García-Godoy F; Flaitz C
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):361-4. PubMed ID: 12691270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptation of dental amalgam to the cavosurface margin of Class I cavity preparations.
    Symons AL; Wing G; Hewitt GH
    J Oral Rehabil; 1987 Jan; 14(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 3469378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
    Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A finely dispersed copper alloy for amalgams. 1. The physical studies].
    Chuev VP; Em VG; Pobochina VV
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1993; 72(4):69-73. PubMed ID: 8108832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical performance and physical properties of twelve amalgam alloys.
    Osborne JW; Gale EN; Chew CL; Rhodes BF; Phillips RW
    J Dent Res; 1978; 57(11-12):983-8. PubMed ID: 281345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal leakage in amalgam restorations and its prevention.
    Ben-Amar A; Kaffe I; Gorfil C
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim; 1978 Jul; 27(3):25-9, 23-5. PubMed ID: 367984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surface treatment of mercury-free alloys.
    Geiger SB; Gurbatov D; Dariel MP; Eichmiller FC; Liberman R; Ratzker M
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 10483447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Amalgam onlay restoration].
    Doukoudakis S
    Hell Stomatol Chron; 1989; 33(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 2486357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The finishing and early marginal fracture of clinical amalgam restorations.
    Bryant RW; Collins CJ
    J Dent; 1989 Jun; 17(3):111-6. PubMed ID: 2768622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Gallium: an alternative for amalgam?].
    Schuurs AH; Davidson CL
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1997 Apr; 104(4):142-5. PubMed ID: 11924385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gallium alloy restorations in primary teeth: a 12-month study.
    Kaga M; Nakajima H; Sakai T; Oguchi H
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Aug; 127(8):1195-200. PubMed ID: 8803395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The development of improved amalgam alloys.
    Brown D
    Br Dent J; 1984 Dec; 157(12):427-31. PubMed ID: 6597724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Handling characteristics of a palladium-free gallium-based alloy compared with a high copper dental amalgam in a simulated clinical trial.
    Shaini FJ; Shortall AC; Ellakwa AE; Marquis PM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Nov; 28(11):1029-36. PubMed ID: 11722719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.