These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6584737)
21. Peer Review--a different view and the present status of dentistry in Canada. Southam W Ohio Dent J; 1975 May; 49(5):44-8. PubMed ID: 1074091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. What can we do to affirm the value of peer review to the public? Underhill HJ; Chaiken II J Dent Pract Adm; 1986; 3(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 3456430 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Peer review works. Benton RM N Y State Dent J; 1995 Dec; 61(10):10. PubMed ID: 8602289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The rotten apples in dentistry: can peer review cull them out? Weiss J Dent Manage; 1977 Jul; 17(7):46-8, 52, 54. PubMed ID: 267593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Funding should recognize the value of peer review. Dominiczak MH Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6919):111. PubMed ID: 12520276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Education and qualification of dentists in the Dutch legislation]. Hokwerda O Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1997 Sep; 104(9):328-31. PubMed ID: 11924419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A peer review quality assurance program in drug information. Tierney M; Godbout L; Repchinsky C Can J Hosp Pharm; 1991 Feb; 44(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 10110041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Peer review in the 90's. Kahn E MSDA J; 1994; 37(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 9552624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Further development of peer-review-procedures in medical rehabilitation]. Farin E; Carl C; Jäckel WH; Rütten-Köppel E; Maier-Riehle B; Berghaus U Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2004 Jun; 43(3):162-5. PubMed ID: 15202040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An innovative approach to peer review for the advanced practice nurse--a focus on critical incidents. Kenny KJ; Baker L; Lanzon M; Stevens LR; Yancy M J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2008 Jul; 20(7):376-81. PubMed ID: 18638177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Exploding 12 myths about quality assurance and peer review. Thompson RE Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(4):39-49. PubMed ID: 10290183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Peer review. It's good for dentists and patients. Benton RM; Shub JL N Y State Dent J; 1995; 61(6):28-9. PubMed ID: 7624099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Experience of six years of a regional peer review scheme in rheumatology. Piper H; Hassell AB; Rowe IF; Delamere J; Rheumatology (Oxford); 2006 Sep; 45(9):1110-5. PubMed ID: 16510528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Research in the general practice: a challenge for dentists]. Bruers JJ Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2009 Jan; 116(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 19202778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. What to expect from peer review. Proesel CL Ill Dent J; 1993; 62(2):101. PubMed ID: 8225342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]