111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6584844)
1. A critical evaluation of xerocephalometry: absorbed dose and diagnostic information.
Kaugars GE; Fatouros PP
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Apr; 57(4):443-50. PubMed ID: 6584844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical comparison of conventional and rare earth screen-film systems for cephalometric radiographs.
Kaugars GE; Fatouros P
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Mar; 53(3):322-5. PubMed ID: 6950349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of rare earth intensifying screens in cephalometric radiography.
Stathopoulos V; Poulton DR
Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 2180348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient radiation dose in conventional and xerographic cephalography.
Copley RL; Glaze SA; Bushong SC; West DC
Am J Orthod; 1979 Nov; 76(5):505-10. PubMed ID: 292313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Determination of absorbed doses of radiation during lateral cephalometric radiography].
Patsakas AJ; Donta CN; Tsiklakis KD
Hell Period Stomat Gnathopathoprosopike Cheir; 1989 Jun; 4(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 2640655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Absorbed radiation dose during lateral cephalometric radiography: comparison of screen-film systems and field-size combinations.
Tsiklakis K; Donta-Bakoyanni C; Tassopoulou M; Kamenopoulou V
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 11314319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exposure reduction in cephalometric radiology: a comprehensive approach.
Tyndall DA; Matteson SR; Soltmann RE; Hamilton TL; Proffit WR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 May; 93(5):400-12. PubMed ID: 3163219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of the sensitometric properties of screen-film systems and conventional dental receptors for intraoral radiography.
Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou L
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 2594331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of image quality on the identification of cephalometric landmarks.
McWilliam JS; Welander U
Angle Orthod; 1978 Jan; 48(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 272131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical comparison of high-speed rare-earth screen and par-speed screen for diagnostic efficacy and radiation dosage.
Robinson T; Becker JA; Olson AP
Radiology; 1982 Oct; 145(1):214-6. PubMed ID: 6821592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imaging characteristics of new screen/film systems for cephalometric radiography.
Fatouros PP; Gibbs SJ; Skubic SE; Rao GU
Angle Orthod; 1984 Jan; 54(1):36-54. PubMed ID: 6584050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. An economic evaluation of the use of rare earth screens to reduce the radiation dose from diagnostic X-ray procedures in Israel.
Ginsberg GM; Schlesinger T; Ben-Shlomo A; Kushilevsky A; Margaliot M; Oren M; Finkleman M; Friedman A; Handlesman M; Lev B
Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):406-12. PubMed ID: 9659134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultra-low-dose routine pediatric radiography utilizing a rare-earth filter.
Wesenberg RL; Amundson GM; Mueller DL; Coupland SG
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1987 Sep; 38(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 2958463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Possibilities of dose reduction in lateral cephalometric radiographs and its effects on clinical diagnostics.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jan; 36(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 17329587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A cephalometric appraisal of xeroradiography.
Chate RA
Am J Orthod; 1980 May; 77(5):547-67. PubMed ID: 6929162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A filter for use in lateral cephalography.
Tanimoto K; Ogawa M; Kodera Y; Tomita S; Wada T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Nov; 68(5):666-9. PubMed ID: 2812721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation absorbed doses in cephalography.
Eliasson S; Julin P; Richter S; Stenström B
Swed Dent J; 1984; 8(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 6585997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reduction of absorbed doses to the thyroid gland in orthodontic treatment planning by reducing the area of irradiation.
Svenson B; Sjöholm B; Jonsson B
Swed Dent J; 2004; 28(3):137-47. PubMed ID: 15506691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Scoliosis examinations: organ dose and image quality with rare-earth screen-film systems.
Fearon T; Vucich J; Butler P; McSweeney WJ; Taylor GA; Markle BM; Hoe J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Feb; 150(2):359-62. PubMed ID: 3257326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Order of magnitude absorbed dose reductions in cephalometric radiography.
Tyndall DA
Health Phys; 1989 Apr; 56(4):533-8. PubMed ID: 2925393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
