BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6584845)

  • 21. Sensitometric properties of Agfa Dentus OrthoLux, Agfa Dentus ST8G, and Kodak Ektavision panoramic radiographic film.
    Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kobayashi N; Farman AG; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 11174605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The evaluation of high-speed screen/film combinations in cephalometric radiography.
    Kimura K; Langland OE; Biggerstaff RH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Dec; 92(6):484-91. PubMed ID: 3479894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of the diagnostic utility of two image receptors for panoramic radiography.
    Carmichael FA; Hirschmann PN; Scaife B; Sheard L; Mackenzie A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 10654038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A study of the zone of sharpness of three panoramic x-ray machines and the effect of screen speed on the sharpness zone.
    Hassen SM; Manson-Hing LR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Aug; 54(2):242-9. PubMed ID: 6956841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Exposure reduction and image quality for pantomographic radiography.
    Tyndall DA; Bedsole SM
    Radiol Technol; 1987; 59(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 3659339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Exposure reduction in cephalometric radiology: a comprehensive approach.
    Tyndall DA; Matteson SR; Soltmann RE; Hamilton TL; Proffit WR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 May; 93(5):400-12. PubMed ID: 3163219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Resolution of several screen-film combinations in rotational panoramic radiography.
    McDavid WD; Morris CR; Tronje G; Welander U
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 3459994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Rare earth filtration: spectral distributions, exposure reduction and image quality effects for panoramic radiography.
    Tyndall DA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1987; 16(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3472971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sensitometric effects of varying the intensifying screens used with Agfa Dentus ST8G and RP6 panoramic radiographic films.
    Wakoh M; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Kitagawa H; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul; 26(4):225-9. PubMed ID: 9442613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [A new rare earth intensifying screen: lanthanum oxybromide (Quanta III - Dupont): relative speed, resolution and image quality (author's transl)].
    Bergamini C; Laudicina L; Marengo M; Pavlica P; Viglietta G; Zanini M
    Radiol Med; 1980 Oct; 66(10):699-704. PubMed ID: 7221029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Experimental evaluation of screen-film combinations for intraoral panoramic radiography.
    Molander B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 3470222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of dose reduction on the detection of anatomical structures on panoramic radiographs.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 16798925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The comparison of subjective image quality in conventional and digital panoramic radiography.
    Peker I; Toraman AM; Usalan G; Altunkaynak B
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 19336855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical comparison of conventional and rare earth screen-film systems for cephalometric radiographs.
    Kaugars GE; Fatouros P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Mar; 53(3):322-5. PubMed ID: 6950349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Image quality and patient dose for different screen-film combinations.
    Guibelalde E; Fernández JM; Vañó E; Llorca A; Ruiz MJ
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Feb; 67(794):166-73. PubMed ID: 8130979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Six screen-film combinations using the Oralix Pan DC.
    Kimura K; Underhill TE; Archila L; Linse JM; Langland OE
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1987 Jun; 29(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 3478427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. 'Disease changes observed in dental panoramic tomographs'.
    Dawood A
    Br Dent J; 1992 Dec 5-19; 173(10):331-2. PubMed ID: 1467005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparative evaluation of rare earth screen-film systems. Free-response operating characteristic analysis and anatomic criteria analysis.
    Fearon T; Vucich J; McSweeney WJ; Potter BM; Brallier DR; McIlhenny J; Tepper J; Markle BM
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Sep; 21(9):734-42. PubMed ID: 3771159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A clinical trial of a rare earth screen/film system in a periapical cassette.
    Kogon SL; Stephens RG; Reid JA; Lubus NJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Apr; 57(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 6584846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radiation dose reduction in panoramic radiography. Orthopantomograph Model OP 3 modified for rare earth intensifying screens.
    Forsgren L; Julin P
    Swed Dent J; 1982; 6(6):225-31. PubMed ID: 6963005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.