346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6586076)
1. Maxillary traction splint: a cephalometric evaluation.
Caldwell SF; Hymas TA; Timm TA
Am J Orthod; 1984 May; 85(5):376-84. PubMed ID: 6586076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Dentoskeletal effects of the maxillary splint headgear in the early correction of Class II malocclusion].
Miguel JAM; Masucci C; Fernandes LQP; Artese F; Franchi L; Giuntini V
Orthod Fr; 2022 Sep; 93(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 36217587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment of Class II, division 1, cases with a maxillary traction splint.
Seçkin O; Surucu R
Quintessence Int; 1990 Mar; 21(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 2374804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dentoskeletal effects of the maxillary splint headgear in the early correction of Class II malocclusion.
Miguel JAM; Masucci C; Fernandes LQP; Artese F; Franchi L; Giuntini V
Prog Orthod; 2020 May; 21(1):11. PubMed ID: 32363550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion.
de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Almeida MR; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):833-42. PubMed ID: 19962606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition.
Wieslander L
Am J Orthod; 1984 Jul; 86(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 6588755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skeletal changes associated with extraoral appliance therapy: an evaluation of 200 consecutively treated cases.
Boecler PR; Riolo ML; Keeling SD; TenHave TR
Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 2596748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes with cervical headgear and mandibular protraction appliance therapy in the treatment of Class II malocclusions.
Siqueira DF; de Almeira RR; Janson G; Brandão AG; Coelho Filho CM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4):447.e21-30. PubMed ID: 17418708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes with the cervical headgear and Jones Jig followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion patients: A retrospective study.
Fontes FPH; Bellini-Pereira SA; Aliaga-Del-Castillo A; Patel MP; Freitas MR; Henriques JFC; Janson G
Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):424-435. PubMed ID: 32278665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion. Part 2--Dentoalveolar changes.
Derringer K
Br J Orthod; 1990 May; 17(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 2357464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The maxillary orthopedic splint.
Joffe L; Jacobson A
Am J Orthod; 1979 Jan; 75(1):54-69. PubMed ID: 283694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The treatment of severe 'gummy' Class II division 1 malocclusion using the maxillary intrusion splint.
Orton HS; Slattery DA; Orton S
Eur J Orthod; 1992 Jun; 14(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 1628688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A cephalometric appraisal of edgewise Class II nonextraction treatment with extraoral force.
Cangialosi TJ; Meistrell ME; Leung MA; Ko JY
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Apr; 93(4):315-24. PubMed ID: 3162641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
