BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6586076)

  • 21. Vertical control as an important ingredient in the treatment of severe sagittal discrepancies.
    Fotis V; Melsen B; Williams S; Droschl H
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Sep; 86(3):224-32. PubMed ID: 6591802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):661-73. PubMed ID: 9637570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy.
    Pancherz H; Malmgren O; Hägg U; Omblus J; Hansen K
    Eur J Orthod; 1989 Feb; 11(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 2714389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Treatment response to maxillary expansion and protraction.
    Ngan P; Hägg U; Yiu C; Merwin D; Wei SH
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Apr; 18(2):151-68. PubMed ID: 8670927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Lima KJ; Henriques JF; Janson G; Pereira SC; Neves LS; Cançado RH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):684-94. PubMed ID: 23631970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Longitudinal study of anteroposterior and vertical maxillary changes in skeletal class II patients treated with Kloehn cervical headgear.
    Lima Filho RM; Lima AL; de Oliveira Ruellas AC
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Apr; 73(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 12725376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Protraction of the maxillofacial complex.
    Mermigos J; Full CA; Andreasen G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Jul; 98(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 2363406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
    Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of a modified maxillary orthopaedic splint: a cephalometric evaluation.
    Uner O; Yücel-Eroğlu E
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Jun; 18(3):269-86. PubMed ID: 8791891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of treatment with the Bass appliance on skeletal Class II malocclusions: a cephalometric investigation.
    Cura N; Saraç M
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Dec; 19(6):691-702. PubMed ID: 9458602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A growth-related concept for skeletal class II treatment.
    Teuscher U
    Am J Orthod; 1978 Sep; 74(3):258-75. PubMed ID: 281130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Holographic and cephalometric study of the relationship between craniofacial morphology and the initial reactions to high-pull headgear traction.
    Duterloo HS; Kragt G; Algra AM
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Oct; 88(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 3863488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Treatment effects of simple fixed appliance and reverse headgear in correction of anterior crossbites.
    Gu Y; Rabie AB; Hägg U
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):691-9. PubMed ID: 10842112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.
    Lee J; Miyazawa K; Tabuchi M; Kawaguchi M; Shibata M; Goto S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 23910205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Growth and treatment changes in patients treated with a headgear-activator appliance.
    Bendeus M; Hägg U; Rabie B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Apr; 121(4):376-84. PubMed ID: 11997762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The use of tensor analysis to investigate facial changes in treated class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Battagel JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Feb; 18(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 8746176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment.
    Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Feb; 85(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 6594053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Long-term stability of Angle Class II, division 1 malocclusions with successful occlusal results at end of active treatment.
    Fidler BC; Artun J; Joondeph DR; Little RM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Mar; 107(3):276-85. PubMed ID: 7879760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.