These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6587305)

  • 1. Detection of proximal carious lesions: two-film versus four-film bitewing radiography.
    Kaffe I; Gordon M; Laufer B; Littner MM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 May; 57(5):567-71. PubMed ID: 6587305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth.
    Crombie K; Parker ME; Nortje CJ; Sanderink GC
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the accuracy of caries diagnosis via radiograph. Film versus print.
    Otis LL; Sherman RG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Mar; 136(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 15819345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro effect of changing the horizontal angulation of X-ray beam on the detection of proximal enamel caries in bitewing radiographs.
    Shokri A; Kasraei S; Shokri E; Farhadian M; Hekmat B
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 30152632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A clinical comparison of X-ray films for detection of proximal surface caries.
    Kantor ML; Reiskin AB; Lurie AG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1985 Dec; 111(6):967-9. PubMed ID: 3864852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A clinical comparison of xeroradiography and film radiography for the detection of proximal caries.
    White SC; Gratt BM; Bauer JG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Feb; 65(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 3422729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical extension of proximal carious lesions compared to bitewing radiographs using photostimulable phosphor plates (PSP).
    Khalaf ME; Baghdadi MT; Faridoun AE; Alshawaf NM; Qudeimat MA
    J Dent; 2022 Jul; 122():104145. PubMed ID: 35523378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A two-film versus a four-film bite-wing examination for caries diagnosis in adults.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A
    Caries Res; 1999; 33(5):380-6. PubMed ID: 10460962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
    Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Value of bitewing radiographs in detection of occlusal caries.
    King NM; Shaw L
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1979 Aug; 7(4):218-21. PubMed ID: 293240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of proximal caries depth determination using two intraoral film speeds.
    Jessee SA; Makins SR; Bretz WA
    Gen Dent; 1999; 47(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 10321157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of beam collimation on image quality.
    Peterson CA; Mauriello SM; Overman VP; Platin E; Tangen CM
    J Dent Hyg; 1997; 71(2):61-70. PubMed ID: 9470560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
    Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical defects in dental enamel vs. natural dental caries: observer differentiation using Ektaspeed Plus film.
    Kang B-C ; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Caries Res; 1996; 30(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 8833141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiovisiographic diagnosis of dental caries: initial comparison of basic mode videoprints with bitewing radiography.
    Russell M; Pitts NB
    Caries Res; 1993; 27(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 8448777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of quantum noise on the detection of incipient proximal caries.
    Okano T; Gröndahl HG; Gröndahl K; Webber RL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Feb; 53(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 6949125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Peker I; Toraman Alkurt M; Altunkaynak B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):495-9. PubMed ID: 18033947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs.
    Kimmes NS; Saini TS; Carroll LR
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 16776410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.