These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6587883)

  • 1. Cavo-surface angles, amalgam margin angles and occlusal cavity preparations.
    Green RM; Jacobsen PH; Edmunds DH
    Br Dent J; 1984 Jun; 156(11):385-6. PubMed ID: 6587883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cavo-surface angles, amalgam margin angles and occlusal cavity preparations.
    Elderton RJ
    Br Dent J; 1984 May; 156(9):319-24. PubMed ID: 6587899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cavosurface margin geometry in conventional and air abrasion Class V cavity preparations.
    Boston DW; Alperstein KS; Boberick K
    Am J Dent; 1997 Apr; 10(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 9545897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of modified cavity design and finishing techniques on the margin region of amalgam restorations: a simulated clinical study.
    Bryant RW
    Aust Prosthodont J; 1992; 6():39-45. PubMed ID: 1300132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Kinetic cavity preparation: protection of the cavo-surface enamel.
    Goto G; Zhang Y
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996; 21(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 9161209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Agreement Among Dental Students, Peer Assessors, and Tutor in Assessing Students' Competence in Preclinical Skills.
    Foley JI; Richardson GL; Drummie J
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Nov; 79(11):1320-4. PubMed ID: 26522637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extension for prevention: is it relevant today?
    Osborne JW; Summitt JB
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):189-96. PubMed ID: 10388375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage and enamel finish.
    Khera SC; Chan KC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Apr; 39(4):414-9. PubMed ID: 273692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of grooves on resistance form of conservative Class 2 amalgams.
    Summitt JB; Howell ML; Burgess JO; Dutton FB; Osborne JW
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(2):50-6. PubMed ID: 1437687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scanning electron micrographic effects of air-abrasion cavity preparation on human enamel and dentin.
    Laurell KA; Hess JA
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 7568724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Axial compressive strength of amalgam fillings in correlation with cavity preparation].
    Mangklabruks S; Heidemann D
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Dec; 44(12):942-6. PubMed ID: 2639011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cavity design for class II composite restorations.
    Ben-Amar A; Metzger Z; Gontar G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Jul; 58(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 3475461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of grooves on resistance form of Class 2 amalgams with wide occlusal preparations.
    Summitt JB; Osborne JW; Burgess JO; Howell ML
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 8337180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The retentive function of dihedral angles in simple Class I amalgam cavities].
    Consani S; Sartini Filho R; Nascimento HD
    Vida Odontol; 1983 Dec; 6(15):25-34, 37. PubMed ID: 6592787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage of amalgam restorations using Amalgambond and Copalite.
    Edgren BN; Denehy GE
    Am J Dent; 1992 Dec; 5(6):296-8. PubMed ID: 1304174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Four-year follow-up of occlusal amalgam restorations in extended vs. nonextended cavity preparation.
    Kusner W; Markitziu A; Hirschfeld Z; Fisher D; Sciaky I
    Isr J Dent Sci; 1988 Nov; 2(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 3270377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Bonding and enamel prisms: is the "bevel" still significant?].
    Nebot D; Fortier JP; Goldberg M; Aldin P
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1990 Sep; 44(171):379-91. PubMed ID: 2239409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of preparation designs and adhesive systems on retention of class II amalgam restorations.
    Görücü J; Tiritoglu M; Ozgünaltay G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Sep; 78(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 9297640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Indications for the use of amalgam and the importance of cavity preparation].
    Riethe P
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Apr; 35(4):462-8. PubMed ID: 6931805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Amalgam onlay restoration.
    Doukoudakis S; Doukoudakis A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Oct; 66(4):493-7. PubMed ID: 1791559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.